Re: Git to SVN

2011-11-10 Thread David Lutterkort
Hi Leo, what you are looking for is 'grafting' the master branch of your current git repo into subversion via git-svn. This blog post[1] helped me a lot when I was doing the same for Deltacloud. David [1] http://journal.sandesh247.com/2009/06/importing-git-history-into-new-svn.html -

Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

2011-11-10 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 to retire Olio. The code grant for olio was signed and recorded (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/sun-microsystems-olio.pdf ) but the checkbox wasn't checked in the podling status. Making it read only would be the proper course of action. Craig On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:1

Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

2011-11-10 Thread j...@nanthrax.net
+1 (binding) -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://wwx.talend.com - Reply message - From: "Benson Margulies" To: Subject: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?] Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 5:33 pm +1 (binding) On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:17 A

Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

2011-11-10 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 (binding) On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Coming back to this. > > It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation > that Olio will graduate. > > So, voting: > > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1, no because... > > Hen > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Willi

[VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

2011-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Coming back to this. It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation that Olio will graduate. So, voting: [ ] +1 [ ] -1, no because... Hen On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 201

Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

2011-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now signed off. I've updated the list below (though I've not yet added new PMCs since June). Here's the previous email: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to

RE: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

2011-11-10 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
+1 (non-binding) >-Original Message- >From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:and...@objectstyle.org] >Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 1:54 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator > >Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here befor

Re: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

2011-11-10 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
+1 (non-binding) Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara - To unsubscribe, e-mail: g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

2011-11-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ditto! On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > +1 binding > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group >> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to add

Re: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

2011-11-10 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 binding Regards, Alan On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of > developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential > obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following

Re: Suitable Names Search [WAS Re: Trademark Kill Searches...]

2011-11-10 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Unless anyone jumps in soon, I'll set up a "Suitable Names Search" > JIRA project https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH Please jump in to fill out details and permissions. Improvements, suggestions, objections, w

Re: Git to SVN

2011-11-10 Thread Upayavira
The ASF exists to produce software for the public good. Its software is its primary (only?) asset. Therefore, it needs to be in control of this asset, and that means being in control of the revision control tools used to maintain it. This means that whatever revision control is used, it must be m

Re: Git to SVN

2011-11-10 Thread Upayavira
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 1:38 PM, "Jeremy Thomerson" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > > In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to > > loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily > > possible to convert