+1
Yegor
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation.
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hi,
the Apache Lucene project has received a contribution of a Japanese
morphological analyzer (Kuromoji)
* The code is attached to the LUCENE-3305 JIRA issue [1]
* The IP Clearance form has been committed to the Incubator website. [2]
* A vote has passed on the dev@l.a.o mailing list [3]
The
+1, definitely.
Deepal
> +1
>
> On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
>> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
>> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the foll
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/08/2011 10:41 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
group of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address
all potential obstacles to the Incubator acce
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
even went
+1
-- dims
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> +1
>
> On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
>> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
>> obstacles t
+1
On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
> even w
This is a great and unique project. Glad to see it here.
+1.
Bruno.
On 08/11/2011, at 04:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
> obstacles to the Inc
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and col
The voting period has now closed. There were no additional votes on this list;
thus, the vote is successful.
The following are the IPMC members who voted +1 on the DEV list:
Ate Douma: +1
Ross Gardler: +1
Hadrian Zbarcea: +1
>-Original Message-
>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfr
[ x ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succ
+1 (non-binding)
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> Opemeetings proposa
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incub
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
> > Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
> group of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to ad
15 matches
Mail list logo
