On 6 October 2011 22:03, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The registry would contain all podling names (current and previous)
>> together with state (active, dormant, graduated, retired) and other
>> basic information.
>> This would be used to generate the po
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> I would like to propose PhoneGap to be an Apache Incubator project.
>> (Under the new, still proposed name, Apache Callback.)
>>
>> Here's a link to the proposal in the curre
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> The registry would contain all podling names (current and previous)
> together with state (active, dormant, graduated, retired) and other
> basic information.
> This would be used to generate the podling summary page(s) as well.
Would said XML file th
Yah that sounds good to me.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> are these topics showstoppers (espc. the licensing question)?
>
> no not at all
>
>> If not the vote can happen.
>
> cool
>
>> Incubator podlings sometimes have to deal
>> out with licensing problems and they somet
> are these topics showstoppers (espc. the licensing question)?
no not at all
> If not the vote can happen.
cool
> Incubator podlings sometimes have to deal
> out with licensing problems and they sometimes vote to change their
> name. Therefore if the Phonegap'ers do not plan to step back, and
Brian,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Hey Jukka I think there are still some questions around the Weinre
> source licenses. Some brainstorms going on over naming on the phonegap
> mailinglist too. What would be normal here? Wait until the start of
> next week perhaps?
are
Hey Jukka I think there are still some questions around the Weinre
source licenses. Some brainstorms going on over naming on the phonegap
mailinglist too. What would be normal here? Wait until the start of
next week perhaps?
-brian
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi all,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 October 2011 20:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> What about storing the podling names in a table somewhere and using a
>> Javascript fragment to read the table and populate the right-column
>> list? Pages that include the script therefore don't hav
On 5 October 2011 20:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
> What about storing the podling names in a table somewhere and using a
> Javascript fragment to read the table and populate the right-column
> list? Pages that include the script therefore don't have to be
> updated at all when the podling list chan
