Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:28 AM, David Crossley wrote: > Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> > >> > Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? >> > Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. >> >> So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project? > > As su

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Gora 0.1.1-incubating release rc4

2011-09-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:54:35PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Ping: does anyone have time for a quick review of this RC? I'd love to push > it out > to the mirrors soon: it's been a long time coming. We need 1 more IPMC VOTE. +0 so far. As far as the tarball contents go, there are

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Gora 0.1.1-incubating release rc4

2011-09-21 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Incubator community, Ping: does anyone have time for a quick review of this RC? I'd love to push it out to the mirrors soon: it's been a long time coming. We need 1 more IPMC VOTE. Cheers, Chris On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Incubator community, > > The

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread David Crossley
Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > > Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? > > Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. > > So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project? As suggested above "Proposal". Or this http://incubator.apache.org/in

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
I will ask to change my apache ID in "italianspammer" :P Sorry again. Cheers, Raffaele On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Lol, > just for a moment I thought to have some super power, something like > the bionic eyes which allow me to see the translated version of ev

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Lol, just for a moment I thought to have some super power, something like the bionic eyes which allow me to see the translated version of every foreign text. Maurizio Cucchiara On 21 September 2011 18:44, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracki

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Si senor Mi piace bere vino e birra > ROFL :D don't you like pizza, spaghetti and gelato? ;) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - To uns

Re: IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?

2011-09-21 Thread Donald Whytock
Apologies...shouldn't have cited [6]. Meant to cite [2]: [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt Good thing IANAL. Don On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal > wrote: >> On the other hand, the ASF general FA

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Akash Ashok
Really Cool Stuff Sounds great :) On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github > (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe > tornare > comodo, v

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Si senor Mi piace bere vino e birra On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github > (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare > comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - o

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
Ooops sorry, wrong address and wrong language :P 2011/9/21 Raffaele P. Guidi > Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github > (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare > comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però s

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previs

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
I would be glad to have you aboard. R On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > Excellent stuff. > > I'd like to join. > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Apache Karaf

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos wr

Re: IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?

2011-09-21 Thread Donald Whytock
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal wrote: > On the other hand, the ASF general FAQ states that the copyright of ASF > projects is owned by the ASF, more specifically "The members own the > code" [5]. Also the IP Clearance template [6] has a check that says > "Check and make sure

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1 (binding) Patrick On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > +1 (non binding) great project > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> > It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> I would like to add this image in addition: >> http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf >> >> Because an image does say more than thousand words... > > Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? > Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. So whats the n

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread sebb
On 21 September 2011 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are > speaking to the general list on their own. The caus

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Francis De Brabandere
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> I would like to add this image in addition: >>> http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf >> >> I like it - I'd just say "mentors", plural, in the reddish box on the right. > > Agreed, I have changed it local and wait if th

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> I would like to add this image in addition: >> http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf > > I like it - I'd just say "mentors", plural, in the reddish box on the right. Agreed, I have changed it local and wait if there are more comments > > -Bertrand > > ---

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >...If nobody wants to get rid of this term (except me), we > should do an update of the Champion description. > > I would like to add this image in addition: > http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf I like it - I'd just sa

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote: What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. >>> >>> The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding >>>

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
+1 (non binding) great project On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for > > discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified > > in res

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Tim Williams
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for > discussion.  A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified > in response.  Sufficient mentors have volunteered.  I thus feel we are > now ready for a vote. > > Th

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Julien Vermillard
+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Thanks for pointing it out, Bertrand. I have just fixed it on the wiki. > > -Flavio > > On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> >>> ...Please c

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread sebb
On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are >>> speaking to the general list on their own. >> >> The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding >> mentors and other interested parties. > > "The Champ

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are >> speaking to the general list on their own. > > The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding > mentors and other interested parties. "The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Spons

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> champion |ˈCHampēən| noun >> 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, >> esp. in sports: >> 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: >> >> The correct usage is of course de

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> champion |ˈCHampēən| noun > 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, > esp. in sports: > 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: > > The correct usage is of course definition #2 What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New fo

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Why must the name be "Champion" and not just "Mentor"? Because Champion is an aptly name for the role. > champion is just another term for the first potential mentor who steps up. It is the correct name for that role: champion |ˈCH

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Flavio Junqueira
Thanks for pointing it out, Bertrand. I have just fixed it on the wiki. -Flavio On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: ...Please cast your votes: [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... * Matthieu Morel (mm at s4 dot

IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?

2011-09-21 Thread Sander van der Waal
I'm trying to get my head around the IP clearance process and specifically about what happens to the copyright ownership during that process. Although IP clearance gets discussed once in a while on this list I couldn't find a clear answer in the archives on this specific point. When a project

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Tim Williams wrote: >>...it seems useful that one person would step forth and >> claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and >> [implicitly] agree to pushing down any artificia

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 09/21/2011 11:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 (binding) 2011/9/20 Patrick Hunt: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered.

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 (binding) 2011/9/20 Patrick Hunt : > It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for > discussion.  A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified > in response.  Sufficient mentors have volunteered.  I thus feel we are > now ready for a vote. > > The latest propos

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > ...Please cast your votes: > > [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... >  * Matthieu Morel (mm at s4 dot io) >  * Anish Nair (an at s4 dot com)... Shouldn't that be s4 dot io instead? -Bertrand --

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread Ioannis Canellos
Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf Committer & PMC Apache ServiceMix Committer Apache Gora

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

2011-09-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Tim Williams wrote: >...it seems useful that one person would step forth and > claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and > [implicitly] agree to pushing down any artificial process hurdles... I agree with that, and someone signing up as

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

2011-09-21 Thread adam wojtuniak
+1 Cheers, Adam On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for > discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified > in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are > now read