On 2011-08-10, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:48:19AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> You might want to use a different extension in the future (.sha512) to
>> reduce the confusion in particular since most Java projects only provide
>> sha1 hashes.
> That makes sense to me, b
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
>> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
>> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
>> votes, and no -1 votes.
>>
>> The bindi
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:48:19AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> You might want to use a different extension in the future (.sha512) to
> reduce the confusion in particular since most Java projects only provide
> sha1 hashes.
That makes sense to me, but it's contrary to the documentation on the
r
Nick Burch 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
> Nick Burch
> 08/09/2011 06:47 PM
>
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> To
>
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation
>
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>
2011/8/9 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Ok.
>> I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
>> But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
>
> Approval is needed but AIUI the IPMC uses lazy consensus
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Ok.
> I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
> But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Approval is needed but AIUI the IPMC uses lazy consensus [2] in this case
I see it [3]. I'm a li
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : http://talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
[1] http://markmail.org/message/3deowalr7h5wreb
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
Great :-)
Hope to see you on the lists sometime soon...
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.a
Devin noticed that we have our first status report due to the Apache
Board tomorrow (Wed). But we don't have an Apache mailing list to
discuss this yet.
So, I've pasted Devin's draft into the wiki. You can review it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011Search for
"ODFToolkit".
Obv
+1 for TLD
My reason: > No suitable TLP exists which is build system and
language agnostic.
And I think RAT is an attractive, little project. With time, it will
become very useful to others.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> Rat is (now) one of the oldest podlings
Congratz!
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Tom White wrote:
> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
> votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> The binding +1 votes:
> Chris A. Mattmann
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
> D
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
If you've got the spare cycles, please feel free to give us a hand!
Currently we have our minimum of 3 mentors:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
Nick
-
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote:
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then
I'll raise my hand as well.
Thanks for the offer. We did hit the required number of moderators last
week, we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the
lists. Once
+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/9/11, Pid wrote:
> From: Pid
> Subject: Re: Apache Rat TLP...?
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 9:52 AM
> On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell
> Donkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 201
On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
>> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
>> could start as the TLP and later become
Hi Nick...
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> HI Nick,
>
> If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then I'll
> raise my hand as well.
>
> I'm looking forward to working with Yegor an
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
> votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> The binding +1 votes:
> Chris A. Mattmann
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
> Doug Cutting
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
votes, and no -1 votes.
The binding +1 votes:
Chris A. Mattmann
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Doug Cutting
Stefan Seelmann
Non-binding +1 votes:
Hyunsik Choi
Thanks eve
18 matches
Mail list logo
