+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
> I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as a
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I like the Apache license and I think having a really free alternative
is good for everyone, as much as clang vs gcc and linux vs FreeBSD.
Apache is also a good fit for OO technologically and I think the
incubation process will end up ben
+1 (non-binding).
I'm not concerned by any "the ASF don't do XYZ" - there's very little
centralization and the pressure will mostly be on the Incubator and
then later members@ to ensure 'the Apache way' isn't closeted to
programmers.
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no ch
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry that we are
bringing a big political dispute with us. My hope is that the community
that was so heavily divide
Thanks Arvind. I'll start going through the steps in
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#bootstrap over the
coming days.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
wrote:
> With 19 +1 votes (11 binding), no -1 votes, and no 0 votes, the vote passes.
>
> Binding v
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:32 AM, dsh wrote:
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
Thanks for the link.
I am learning the Apache way and their terminology to tell about
Apache OpenOffice.org to members of OpenOffice.org Japanese Langu
With 19 +1 votes (11 binding), no -1 votes, and no 0 votes, the vote passes.
Binding votes
Chris Mattmann
Sanjiva Weerawarana
Ralph Goers
Julien Vermillard
Mark Struberg
Tommaso Teofili
Leo Simons
Christian Grobmeier
Niall Pemberton
Patrick Hunt
Tom White
Non-binding votes
This VOTE is now closed. I will be sending out the results in a
separate mail soon.
Thanks and Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
Hi Kazunari,
that's an explanation of the role "Champion" as it can be found at the
Apache incubator proposal guide [1]:
The Champion is a person already associated with Apache who leads the
proposal process. It is common - but not necessary - for the Champion
to also be proposed as a Mentor.
A
Hi Sam Ruby san,
Thanks for your proposal.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
As written in the proposal, you are "Champion" of Apache
OpenOffice.org incubator project (Apache calls this "podling,"
right?).
What is "Champion"?
What does "Champion" do?
Thanks,
khirano
--
+1 (binding)
Dick
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Don Harbison
>
> Sam Ruby wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
>
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
>> [ ] -1 Rejec
+1 (non-binding)
- Don Harbison
Sam Ruby wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Eric
On 10/06/11 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org a
I don't understand the assertions here. It may not matter in the larger scheme
of things, but I didn't want some of the assumptions here to go unquestioned.
1. It is certainly the case that the proposal comprehends sustaining
OpenOffice.org and continuing it as an Apache project. The proposal
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: genera
Hi Joani,
nice to see you joining this project! :)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 23:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
Voluntee
On 11.06.2011 18:43, Steve Lee wrote:
Very cool. While IBM contributed its accessibility code to Oracle last
year, Oracle was unable to fully integrate.
We should finish that work if the proposal passes to podling. It looks
like this will be an effort you
would want to consider working on. This i
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
>
> On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
>> The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
>> the ODF format
>> was not discussed.
>
> Yes it was. In f
On 11 June 2011 18:16, Malte Timmermann wrote:
> On 11.06.2011 18:43, Steve Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> Very cool. While IBM contributed its accessibility code to Oracle last
>>> year, Oracle was unable to fully integrate.
>>> We should finish that work if the proposal passes to podling. It looks
>>> like
Hi Peter,
On 11.06.2011 19:49, Peter Korn wrote:
I doubt I'll contribute much direct code to the effort, but I look
forward to helping with design decisions that affect accessibility.
Would be nice to continue working with you on accessibility :)
Malte.
Hi Peter,
The vote is currently open and thus the proposal has been fixed until the end
of the vote. Once the vote has completed and the podling PMC has been formed I
will ensure your request is processed.
Thanks for your interest.
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: genera
Hi Joani,
nice to see you joining this project! :)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 23:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
Voluntee
On 11.06.2011 18:43, Steve Lee wrote:
Very cool. While IBM contributed its accessibility code to Oracle last
year, Oracle was unable to fully integrate.
We should finish that work if the proposal passes to podling. It looks
like this will be an effort you
would want to consider working on. This i
Hi,
My name is Peter Korn, and I've been working on accessibility for
the last 20 years.
I started that career developing assistive technologies for folks
with vision impairments, and then moved to Sun where I worked on
platform accessibility frameworks.
+1 (non-binding)
/-/-/-/-/-/
Scott Wilson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(non-binding)
At first I thought beeing on the committers list would imply my approval
of the proposal. But now I'd like to give the reasons for my vote as so
many others did:
(All just my point of view as an suburban inhabitant of the "old" OOo
community
Hi Sam,
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding). Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
+++
On 11 June 2011 17:30, wrote:
> Joanmarie Diggs wrote on 06/10/2011 05:28:59
> PM:
>
>> Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
>> to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
>>
>> Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
>>
>> Volunteer Job:
>
Joanmarie Diggs wrote on 06/10/2011 05:28:59
PM:
> From: Joanmarie Diggs
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/11/2011 10:04 AM
> Subject: Request to join as initial committer
> Sent by: Joanmarie Diggs
>
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be ad
+1 (binding)
I have similar concerns as Niclas and a few other folks here, and estimate the
risk of failure of this very visible podling as too high. I wasn't sure about
my vote till the last moment. But in the current situation I don't see an
alternative to ASF taking it and trying to do our b
Hello,
I've been thinking for quite a while whether I should raise my voice and
vote or not. I've made my standpoint rather clear the last days, so I
wanted to abstain from voting, as I've shown all the facts already.
However, having been in involved with the OpenOffice.org project for
many y
+1 (non-binding)
--
Steve Lee
Full Measure - open source accessibility - http://fullmeasure.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache
-1 (non-binding)
As stated elsewhere [1], this incubator, combined with the
disruption and delay it's causing to the OOo ecosystem, does not add
enough unique value to what we already have a TDF to justify the
effort.
(I'm referring to the existing proposal's mission statement [2], not
to the (qu
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:28:59PM -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
> to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
>
> Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
>
> Volunteer Job:
> * Orca project lead (1+ yea
On 11 June 2011 15:37, Sam Ruby wrote:
> The vote has already started, and was based on revision 207 of the wiki page:
My apologies. I only just joined so I'll search the archives to find out more.
Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Steve Lee wrote:
> On 10 June 2011 22:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>> Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
>> to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
>>
>> Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
>>
>> Vol
On 10 June 2011 22:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
> to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
>
> Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
>
> Volunteer Job:
> * Orca project lead (1+ years) and developer (
Hi!
Sorry for this just-under-the-wire request, but I would love to be added
to the list of initial committers if it is not too late.
Most of my strengths are around accessibility:
Volunteer Job:
* Orca project lead (1+ years) and developer (5+ years)
* GNOME Accessibility Project assistant to t
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
>
> On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>
> > The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
> > the ODF format
> > was not discussed.
>
> Yes it wa
This is such a difficult call. Will OOo at Apache take off sufficiently
to contribute something of value to the ecosystem, or will it fail,
taking goodwill with it? Will it create division in the community, or
does that division already exist, and creating the podling will simply
make the fact of a
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
N
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Yes, and I also like to correct my previous statement: I actually meant that
ALL votes are welcome (not only +1)!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> From: Daniel Shahaf
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-1.
I think by accepting this ASF is risking quite a lot of flak and
reputational damage. We have too
-1 (non-binding)
Within the discussion several reasons that might support a -1 vote were
named, many have been addressed or may be addresed by the podling.
I still feel obligated to vote -1 because (even if the podling advances
to a Apache TLP) this will be the end of "OpenOffice.org as it is
On Jun 11, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>
> The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
> the ODF format
> was not discussed. This would probably make the Free Software
> Foundation (FSF) happy.
>
> T
>>> I think Italo is incorrect saying voting "no" would be a defeat for
>>> free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
>>> could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
>>
>> They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
>> "no" to OOo
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis
wrote:
>
> Now that you mention it; the voting started at time (7.02pm local time).
> Benson Margulies voted at 7.03pm.
> You voted at 7.05pm.
>
> Is the voting start time pre-announced?
The voting time was pre-announced on this very list:
http:/
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
> the ODF format
> was not discussed.
Yes it was. In fact it was the suggestion that OO.o should be refactored so
that
+0 (non-binding)
I would likely have voted +1 if there were no existing Open Source
community behind LibreOffice.
The alleged(!) necessity to remove/replace LGPL libraries not covered by
the Oracle grant will not result in an improved free office suite but
only in delays and further incompatibili
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Ketih,
>
>> I think Italo is incorrect saying voting "no" would be a defeat for
>> free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
>> could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
>
> They have been dis
Hi,
Am 11.06.2011 06:17, schrieb Keith Curtis:
I think LibreOffice people are quiet for various reasons:
Everyone here votes on his own behalf, for his own reasons and at the
time he feels to be the right time.
There is currently no need to vote on anybody's behalf (really - nobody
here o
Hi Gavin,
2011/6/11 Gavin McDonald :
>> From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
Hi Gavin,
Op 11-6-2011 10:59, Gavin McDonald schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here
> -Original Message-
> From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
>
> [ ] +1 A
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt
that the project will find the need
57 matches
Mail list logo
