Good morning,
as most of the discussion happened when I slept, I will give a
summarizinig answer from the top. (With unusally top-posting against
the netiquette)
There are two associations (german: "eingetragener Verein" abbrev. e.V.)
- Team OpenOffice.org e.V., based in Hamburg. The members are
On 06/09/2011 08:06 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Martin Hollmichel <
> martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to
>> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org
>>
Hi Martin...welcome. Nice to see you post here.
Danese
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Hollmichel <
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to
> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org
> C
Welcome Paul! We are delighted to have you on the team!
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Zimdars, Paul A (3880-Affiliate)
wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Thanks this project looks awesome. I know you've already started VOTE'ing but
> I'm super interested to join up. We've used Sq
Hi Simon,
Am 09.06.2011 00:14, schrieb Simon Phipps:
Presumably it would also be possible to have a group outside ASF called eg
Friends of Open Office ( FOO) that raised money and put it to code
development or marketing or whatever. Not saying that is the best way just
its a possibility.
Do
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Martin Hollmichel <
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to
> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org
> Community Council (CC) until 2010 and also Chair of Team Op
> My suggestion, and that's all it is, was to seek a mentor for ASF who does
> *not*
> have your history, nor anyone's with that great legacy.
I have no clue about OOo in the past. I have no great legacy.
And I will try to help mentoring. Is that what you wanted?
> Rather, the suggestion
> was to
Hi,
time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org
Community Council (CC) until 2010 and also Chair of Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
We founded Team OpenOffice.org e.V. in 2003 to serve for the items
described for the
Hey Guys,
Thanks this project looks awesome. I know you've already started VOTE'ing but
I'm super interested to join up. We've used Sqoop in a couple of my projects
here at NASA and I am interested in contributing. I've added myself to the wiki
as a committer and look forward to working with yo
Hi,
Le 9 juin 11 à 02:51, Simon Phipps a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Please.
OK :-)
Doesn't look like they do, no. They benefit the OpenOffice.org
community.
Mind you, that does include LibreOffice.
Well, I'm absolutely NOT ok with that. There are
Welcome Derek!
Jon.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Derek Deeter wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm Derek Deeter, and I'm volunteering to be a committer for the Flume
> project. I'm a senior engineer here at Intuit with several years of C++
> and Java experience, also with other languages/projects havi
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
accounted for since the fork.
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Andy Brownwrote:
Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
accounted for since the fork
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:38:48PM -0700, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Flume for incubation
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscri
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:58:38AM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> The ASF does not muddy the waters of open source development with cash. Our
> sponsors do not sponsor specific projects or activities. For this reason we
> cannot ask IBM or anyone else to pay for this podling.
>
> I do agree that th
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I think it would be good if the proposed committers who have not yet done
so, could post a quick note to the list, to introduce yourself and your
interest in this project. Think of this as an opportunity to introduce
yourself to your fut
Danese Cooper wrote on 06/08/2011 09:31:24 PM:
> From: Danese Cooper
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/08/2011 09:31 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenOffice Proposal: Nominated Mentors
>
> Help me understand why the project would most benefit from that
situation,
> Don.
First off, I mean no
Hi All,
I'm Derek Deeter, and I'm volunteering to be a committer for the Flume
project. I'm a senior engineer here at Intuit with several years of C++
and Java experience, also with other languages/projects having been in the
software industry for 33+ years. We will be utilizing Flume to provide
Help me understand why the project would most benefit from that situation,
Don.
Mentors' main role is to help podling members learn the Apache Way so they
can graduate to TLP. This project enjoys a wealth of excellent mentors and
we happen to mostly be people who have worked successfully together
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:07 AM, wrote:
>
> In the same regard, the Team OpenOffice.org e.V. to which IBM and other
> corporate sponsors provided annual financial support may now wish to
> consider consolidation with http://www.frodev.org/. If that seems
> inappropriate, perhaps both need to be re
Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 08:51:45 PM:
> From: Simon Phipps
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/08/2011 08:54 PM
> Subject: Re: OOo Monetary Donations
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> >
> > > An
On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
Ross Gardler wrote on 06/08/2011 08:44:43 PM:
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/08/2011 08:46 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenOffice Proposal: Nominated Mentors
>
> On 09/06/2011 01:21, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > "Noel J. Bergman" wrote on 06/08/2011 03:33:42
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
>
> > Andrew Rist wrote:
> >> to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
> >> searching for a more complete answer
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It would be interesting to find out if a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:43 AM, wrote:
> Don Harbison
> Program Director, IBM ODF Initiative
> Tel. +1-978-399-7018
> Mobile: +1-978-761-0116
> Email: donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com
>
> Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 07:51:20 PM:
>
> > From: Simon Phipps
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > D
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Andrew Rist wrote:
>> to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
>> searching for a more complete answer
>>
>>
>
> It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
> accounted for since the fork. The e
On 09/06/2011 01:21, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
"Noel J. Bergman" wrote on 06/08/2011 03:33:42 PM:
From: "Noel J. Bergman"
To:
Date: 06/08/2011 03:34 PM
Subject: RE: OpenOffice Proposal: Nominated Mentors
Robert Weir wrote:
- Community development, due to the need to develop and
coor
Don Harbison
Program Director, IBM ODF Initiative
Tel. +1-978-399-7018
Mobile: +1-978-761-0116
Email: donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com
Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 07:51:20 PM:
> From: Simon Phipps
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/08/2011 07:52 PM
> Subject: Re: OOo Monetary Donation
Don Harbison
Program Director, IBM ODF Initiative
Tel. +1-978-399-7018
Mobile: +1-978-761-0116
Email: donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com
Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 06:44:35 PM:
> From: Simon Phipps
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 06/08/2011 06:45 PM
> Subject: Re: OOo Monetary Donation
"Noel J. Bergman" wrote on 06/08/2011 03:33:42 PM:
> From: "Noel J. Bergman"
> To:
> Date: 06/08/2011 03:34 PM
> Subject: RE: OpenOffice Proposal: Nominated Mentors
>
> Robert Weir wrote:
>
> > - Community development, due to the need to develop and
> > coordinate/collaborate with current an
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>> to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
>> searching for a more complete answer
>>
>>
>>
> It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
> accounted for since the fork. Th
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM, wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 06:44:35 PM:
>
> > >
> >
> > I was actually thinking of Freies Office Deutschland e.V. primarily,
> > http://www.frodev.org/
> >
>
> Interesting. That happens to also be where TDF donations go:
>
> http://www.documentfou
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>> to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
>> searching for a more complete answer
>>
>>
>>
> It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
> accounted for since the fork. Th
Simon Phipps wrote on 06/08/2011 06:44:35 PM:
> >
>
> I was actually thinking of Freies Office Deutschland e.V. primarily,
> http://www.frodev.org/
>
Interesting. That happens to also be where TDF donations go:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/
-Rob
-
Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
accounted for since the fork. The e.V changed names and collects
donations for LibreOffice, http://
http://www.teamopenoffice.de/
I believe it is at the disposal of the Community Council, so probably Louis
could give a more complete answer.
S.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
> to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
> searching for a more complete
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
Oracle Email Signature Logo
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
Oracle Corporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
On 6/8/2011 4:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 8, 20
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I started looking around at the OOo website.
>
> I'm not sure if now is the time to bring this up, but at
> http://contributing.openoffice.org/donate.html there is a solicitation for
> funds via three processes.
>
> Here's what the page says:
>
Indeed, the ASF has been consistent that monetary donations be made to
the ASF as a whole, and we have not accepted targeted cash donations for
specific projects in the past. And as a Foundation, we have not paid
directly for development on our projects (although obviously we have a
paid sysad
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
>>
>> On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>> Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of
>
>>
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of
the
ways
in which your funds might be used include:
• Hiring independent dev
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> > > Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of
> the
> > ways
> > > in which your funds might be used include:
> > > • Hiring independen
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 3:51 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Add incubator group to podling committers
>
> Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > I sent this to infra, but I have been told the in
On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> > Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of the
> ways
> > in which your funds might be used include:
> > • Hiring independent developers to work with OpenOffice.org.
> > • Paying for part
Dave Fisher wrote:
> Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of the
ways
> in which your funds might be used include:
> • Hiring independent developers to work with OpenOffice.org.
> • Paying for participation at trade shows and conferences.
> • Paying f
I started looking around at the OOo website.
I'm not sure if now is the time to bring this up, but at
http://contributing.openoffice.org/donate.html there is a solicitation for
funds via three processes.
Here's what the page says:
> Your donation will go directly towards helping this project.
Andrew Rist wrote:
> I'll quote my earlier answer [1] on that:
> Our approach is to start with the main open source code - stuff with
> clear provenance. The OOo extensions are more complex in terms of
> licensing and other issues, but this is certainly something to revisit
> at a later stage of t
I'll quote my earlier answer [1] on that:
Our approach is to start with the main open source code - stuff with
clear provenance. The OOo extensions are more complex in terms of
licensing and other issues, but this is certainly something to revisit
at a later stage of the project.
(acknowledged
Richard S. Hall wrote (08-06-11 11:03)
On 06/08/2011 04:16 AM, Christian Lippka wrote:
Moin Moin [1],
my name is Christian Lippka and I work on the donnated code base since
1998
[..]
I just wanted to say that this is one of the best messages I've read
throughout this entire ordeal. Thanks.
I just checked with my Brazilian friends involved with the BrOffice
project in the past years, and it seems that all problems that we've
had in the past with the OpenOffice.org trademark are now solved.
Best,
Jomar
-
To unsubscr
On 07/06/2011 Andrew Rist wrote:
> We are trying to provide all of the Oracle owned content in the OOo
> repositories.
As a longtime OpenOffice.org volunteer (mini-introduction: involved with
the OpenOffice.org project since 2003, main contributions in QA,
Localization and QA Tools, Italian Proje
Manfred A. Reiter wrote (07-06-11 17:51)
2011/6/7 Danese Cooper:
Well...the original owner of the code, Marco Boerries, was really
fond of the name OpenOffice. No other name would do. However,
Sun's lawyers were not willing to endorse a name that they couldn't
secure worldwide trademarks on.
As I understand it, the trademark issues are being dealt with by the
appropriate Oracle & ASF people.
It is not an issue of 'if', but 'how'. IANAL - so I'll let them handle
it.
Andrew
On 6/8/2011 1:02 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Nothing else has been received from Oracle. You will be the thir
Nothing else has been received from Oracle. You will be the third
person to know. ;-)
Craig
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The expectation, assumption and intent behind the grant was
that Openoffice.org would also be granted. In many, many ways,
this trademark is just as i
The expectation, assumption and intent behind the grant was
that Openoffice.org would also be granted. In many, many ways,
this trademark is just as important, if not more so, than the
actual code for the success of the podling.
Have we rec'd the updated grant yet?
---
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Danese,
>
> > 3) LOTS of people download OOo
> > Like maybe 10% of the human population of the planet. And its a big
> file.
> > Initially we engaged Akamai, but it quickly became too expensive. Serving
> up downloads of OOo was pretty
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Robert Weir wrote:
>
>> - Community development, due to the need to develop and
>> coordinate/collaborate with current and anticipated
>> downstream consumers of the project, as well as potentially
>> forging bi-directional collaborations.
>
I finally had access to the edit function and updated the wiki.
Thanks everyone for the support :)
Best,
Jomar
-Original Message-
From: Danese Cooper
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:20:38
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Robert Weir wrote:
> - Community development, due to the need to develop and
> coordinate/collaborate with current and anticipated
> downstream consumers of the project, as well as potentially
> forging bi-directional collaborations.
> we would benefit from having incubation mentors with noted s
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> We at Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that seeing
> our code in wide use is more important than money. OpenOffice.org is
> important to the Developing World, some of whom will pay for convenience. I
> would hate t
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I say that the sooner one can move to uni-directional flows with the
> bi-directionals out in customization and adoption layers, if anywhere, the
> better. It is difficult to conceive of any other way to get on top of the
> refactorin
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, wrote:
> This is for the proposal, the "Nominated Mentors" section.
>
> My observation, after seeing the topics that seem to be getting the most
> attention from the IPMC members on this list, is that in the the Podling
> we will want to pay special attention to:
>
Hi,
I almost forgot about that, as it is not a summit but may be the
earliest date for a meeting.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/DE/QAWochenende2011
So if some of you live rather close to Essen/Germany you may join us
there. It would be helpfull to understand / speak German, as it is
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
> > firewall
> > keeping me from SSH), I'm "in the office."
> And I was even pretty sure somebody said you were on honeymoon -
No, we actually haven't had time for other than a couple of get-aw
Hello, Niall,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:11:02AM +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> If you're right about the costs, they not going to hit from day one -
> as the initial effort will be in building the community and building
> something that can be released and very little needed in terms of end
> us
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Ian Lynch :
>> On 7 June 2011 16:27, Volker Merschmann wrote:
>>> 2011/6/7 Ian Lynch :
>>> > On 7 June 2011 16:08, Volker Merschmann wrote:
>>> >> > Apache is community centered with an open culture. Please encourage as
>>> >
>> I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
>> handle this.
>
> I've made the changes via the command line interface.
Thank you very much Noel!
>> I have hear our inc-chair is ooo
>
> Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
> firewall
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
> handle this.
I've made the changes via the command line interface.
I wish there were some consistency on this when accounts are setup, but that's
something we can discuss with infra. Oft-times
>> Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
>> transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
>> make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
>> the transformation natively during design time in OO or Symphony.
>>
>>
>
>
+1
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
> a
> link to the document in the wiki:
> h
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Tom White wrote:
> +1
>
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
> wrote:
> > As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> > days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> > Apache Incubator p
Actually I evaluated XSL-FO rendering engines quite excessively
including Apache FOP. At that point in time (2009) Apache FOP still
had performance issues in scenarios where you would generate thousands
of business correspondence documents to be sent to clients on a daily
basis. In the end we decid
Hi,
can we please just end this futile discussion?
I agree, that water flows one direction only. But there needs to be
water first to flow in any direction.
If there will be enough to establish a flow, can only be seen, once the
podling is in place. The risk estimation (will the podling run
On 8 June 2011 07:47, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
>>> update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
>>> acronym got somehow hijiacked in this list) - do we have a deputy
>>> handling it?
>>>
>>
>> Thirty-six
dsh wrote on 06/08/2011 12:15:52 PM:
>
> Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
> transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
> make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
> the transformation natively during design
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Khirano,
>
> I just noticed your mail never received a response. Sorry for that, reply
> online...
>
> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:02, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It has been familiar with
On 6/8/2011 11:12 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>
>> Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
>
> No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
> the other, then it must be the former ...
I believe the proper quest
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> The code bases are already divergent and it would be very difficult to
> reconcile them. To make Apache OOo "upstream" from LO would mean one
> of two things
OK, let's clarify for sensibility: Apache would be upstream (licensing
acting as a diode), but not THE upstream.
Ian Lynch wrote:
> It's no good saying "if this or if that" because we are
> where we are. If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle :-).
Exactly.
> This is really the crux of all the discussions. Is it better to maximise
the
> development resource through cooperation or is it better to have two
>
+1
Tom
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
> link to the document in the wiki:
>
+1
Tom
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
> of the proposal
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>
>> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current propo
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
> wrote:
>
>> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
>> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
>> Apache Incubator pr
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > Just because you choose a particular license that does not make you
> > de-facto 'upstream'.
You may not like that a diode only allows current to flow one way, but that is
its function.
The notion of upstream is simply a factual function that
Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
the transformation natively during design time in OO or Symphony.
Anyway I suspect that's
On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> [...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
> under the current licensing regime is for all core development to be
> done here, and for TDF to be a downstre
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
the other, then it must be the former ...
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do th
dsh wrote on 06/08/2011 10:37:46 AM:
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
> > A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is
going
> > to involve document manipulations at both tiers. For example, we
recently
> > (at IBM) made an insurance solution that involved us
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
>>> and the slig
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 6/8/2011 10:06 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> On 08/06/2011 16:33, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. find a proper coherence and relevance between Apache OOo&
>>> LibreOffice on a technological level and on a distribution level
>>> 2.
>
> I think it would be good if the proposed committers who have not yet done
> so, could post a quick note to the list, to introduce yourself and your
> interest in this project. Think of this as an opportunity to introduce
> yourself to your future collaborators on Apache OpenOffice.
>
Ian Lyn
Khirano,
I just noticed your mail never received a response. Sorry for that, reply
online...
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:02, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
>
>
> It has been familiar with us to file issues and comment on them.in the
> bugzilla that we ca
On 6/8/2011 10:06 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 16:33, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>
>> 1. find a proper coherence and relevance between Apache OOo&
>> LibreOffice on a technological level and on a distribution level
>> 2. find a proper coherence with IBM's business requirements (Symphony)
On 08/06/2011 16:33, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
My understanding is that the Apache OpenOffice codebase matters to IBM
and anyone who would want to use the specificities of the Apache
licensing, and I understand this as being a reality we can all agree
on. Instead of spending hours and keystrokes p
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
> link to the document in the wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.
On 8 June 2011 15:40, wrote:
> "Manfred A. Reiter" wrote on 06/08/2011 10:17:02 AM:
>
> It would be perfectly possible, and actually quite easy for
> someone
> > > to host the files with a scalable cloud storage provider, e.g.,
> Amazon,
> > > and charge $0.99 for the download, the cost of an iP
"Manfred A. Reiter" wrote on 06/08/2011 10:17:02 AM:
>
> 2011/6/7 :
>
> [...]
>
> > We should be able to check the math from another direction. Microsoft
> > claims something like 400 million Office users. Studies looking at
OOo
> > install share show approximately 10%. Pick some random n
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
> A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is going
> to involve document manipulations at both tiers. For example, we recently
> (at IBM) made an insurance solution that involved using Symphony, extended
> with a Plugin, submitting d
Hi -Rob
2011/6/7 :
> Danese Cooper wrote on 06/07/2011 03:43:56 PM:
>
>> robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
>>
>> Not surprisingly, you missed my point (or chose to ignore it). We at
>
> Honestly, your insult does surprise me.
>
>> Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that
>> seeing
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
