[RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release

2011-05-31 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, This VOTE has passed. I'll push the bits out to the mirrors. Thanks! Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Offic

Policy for BUILD and CHANGES files in podling releases

2011-05-31 Thread Eric Sammer
Incubators: I can't find an appropriate policy on the licensing requirements of ancillary files like BUILD or CHANGES files that are commonly distributed with releases. I'm specifically looking at the somewhat vague and confusing http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html but also h

Re: Podling "publicity" guidelines and release announcements

2011-05-31 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message > From: Marvin Humphrey > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Tue, May 31, 2011 8:59:28 PM > Subject: Podling "publicity" guidelines and release announcements > > My inclination is to just move forward without going to the PRC for now, but > consider request

Podling "publicity" guidelines and release announcements

2011-05-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Greets, I'm confused about when this directive applies: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#activities Publicity activities Podlings MUST coordinate with the Apache Public Relations Committee on all publicity activities by a podling. The open source space can b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator

2011-05-31 Thread Upayavira
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:53 -0700, "Jonathan Hsieh" wrote: > Hi, > > I have a few questions. > > My understanding is that a podling requires 3 +1s for progress (releases, > new commiters). Does this mean we need at least 3 mentors? Would it be > helpful to have "extra"? Strictly you do not ne

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator

2011-05-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:53:22AM -0700, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > My understanding is that a podling requires 3 +1s for progress (releases, > new commiters). And those "binding" +1s need to come from people who are on the Incubator PMC. They do not technically have to be Mentors to your project,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator

2011-05-31 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
Hi, I have a few questions. My understanding is that a podling requires 3 +1s for progress (releases, new commiters). Does this mean we need at least 3 mentors? Would it be helpful to have "extra"? Is having the Champion being a Mentor ok? Are there any concerns/discussion with the proposal?

Re: watching the commit profile

2011-05-31 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Very good idea. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > I typically use markmail archives of the commit mailing list. Shows > nice graphs of the most active committers. You can filter on a > particular committer as wel. > > Another option would be to use the github mirrors of o

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4

2011-05-31 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Hi, I think you already have a 3rd binding vote from Steve Loughran [1]. Kind Regards, Stefan [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-hama-dev/201105.mbox/%3c4dc916a7.6000...@apache.org%3E On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hello all > Hama release 0.2.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4

2011-05-31 Thread Tommaso Teofili
Hello all Hama release 0.2.0-incubating RC 4 has have 2 binding +1s (from me and Stefan) but it'd be great if someone else from IPMC could take some time to review it and vote. Thanks in advance, Tommaso 2011/5/16 Edward J. Yoon > Hi, we need one more vote to release this. > > On Wed, May 11, 2

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC2-incubating

2011-05-31 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi... Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC2-incubating is undergoing. -- Forwarded message -- From: Dan Haywood Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:36 PM Subject: [VOTE] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC2-incubating To: "isis-...@incubator.apache.org" I've staged a new re

Re: watching the commit profile

2011-05-31 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I typically use markmail archives of the commit mailing list. Shows nice graphs of the most active committers. You can filter on a particular committer as wel. Another option would be to use the github mirrors of our repositories (I used that recently to see how active wicket committers were), and

Re: watching the commit profile

2011-05-31 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Emmanuel... There is no sign-up for this service, it only shows sign-in. Also I can see that you can sign-in with your google account. But is it configured to sign-in with our Apache account ? I didn't try till I know that this is safe. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sqoop Project

2011-05-31 Thread Phillip Rhodes
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:40 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote: > Greetings All, > > We would like to propose Sqoop Project for inclusion in ASF Incubator as a > new podling. Sqoop is a tool designed for efficiently transferring bulk > data > between Apache Hadoop and structured datastores such as rel

Re: watching the commit profile

2011-05-31 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 5/31/11 2:57 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Is there a quick way to check the diversity of commits to a podling? I mentor one where the ratio of commits between one individual and the rest of the universe seems to be tending toward infinity, and I'd like to check before pointing this out. http:/

watching the commit profile

2011-05-31 Thread Benson Margulies
Is there a quick way to check the diversity of commits to a podling? I mentor one where the ratio of commits between one individual and the rest of the universe seems to be tending toward infinity, and I'd like to check before pointing this out.

Re: [VOTE] Release ace version 0.8.0-incubator and related subprojects

2011-05-31 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (binding) Hi Karl... I reviewed the docs again and you are right. But for general FYI please look at my reply below On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: >> Hi Karl... >> >>   Most of things look OK, bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator

2011-05-31 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (binding) On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Mon, 5/30/11, Yoav Shapira wrote: > >> From: Yoav Shapira >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Date: Monday, May 30, 2011, 11:18 P

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator

2011-05-31 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 5/30/11, Yoav Shapira wrote: > From: Yoav Shapira > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Flume for the Apache Incubator > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Date: Monday, May 30, 2011, 11:18 PM > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:18 AM, > Jonathan Hsieh > wrote: > > I would like to

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-113) Hudson access for MRUnit podling

2011-05-31 Thread Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041485#comment-13041485 ] Niklas Gustavsson commented on INCUBATOR-113: - I've gone ahead and added yo

[VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.5.0-incubating (candidate 1)

2011-05-31 Thread Tom White
Please vote on the following release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.5.0-incubating. We already received two binding IPMC +1 votes for the PPMC release vote on whirr-dev. PPMC release vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-whirr-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktimd_d7ar611s4