Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-08 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.2-incubating (non-binding) Tks, - Eric > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, and > website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are only > changes of text, no

Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.3.0

2011-04-08 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:03:45PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote: > For my education: is there a good checklist for what needs to be in a > release ? Many (most?) projects roll their own release checklists. Over at the Lucy podling, we've chosen to create three separate wiki pages: http://w

Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.3.0

2011-04-08 Thread David Lutterkort
Hi, thanks for the review; I've addressed most of the issues you found. I will finish that on Monday and spin RC2. For my education: is there a good checklist for what needs to be in a release ? It seems that the requirements are fairly well distributed across the Apache website. Some comments b

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/8/11 7:06 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I don't recall the Commons PMC saying the project needs to be renamed when it > voted to sponsor this project. If that is necessary I'm sure they will let > the project know. We voted to sponsor OGNL. Martin is right that our policy is to avoid the cute

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Ralph Goers
I don't recall the Commons PMC saying the project needs to be renamed when it voted to sponsor this project. If that is necessary I'm sure they will let the project know. Ralph On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Martin Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeremias Maerki > wrote: >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Cooper
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm sorry that I can't help out but when reading this I thought that > using the spec name as the project name is probably not ideal. How about > calling it Apache (Commons) Ogranal? Hopefully, this doesn't have any > strange meaning in so

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2.1 - voting based on RC2

2011-04-08 Thread Josh Thompson
The following votes were cast: +1 Alan Cabrera +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matt Hogstrom +1 Stefan Bodewig That's a total of +4 votes. The vote passes for the IPMC to approve the release of Apache VCL 2.2.1. I'll get the artifacts, sums, and signature created and posted online shortly. We in the ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi!!! Also Lucene comes from sourceforge and kept its name :P Merci Olivier, I'm going to write that mail just now, thanks!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > +1 to keep the name as long as we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, +1 to keep the name as long as we have all clearly signed donation papers from the original authors. Maybe you could ask too on legal-discuss@a.o ? /Olivier 2011/4/8 Simone Tripodi : > Hi Mark, > as Jochen reported, this is the original project donated to the ASF, > under the signed Softw

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Ioannis Canellos
I can recall a lot of projects moving to apache from source-forge (e.g. jenna, opennlp), codehaus (e.g. servicemix) and none of them had trademark related issues. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Mark, > as Jochen reported, this is the original project donated to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mark, as Jochen reported, this is the original project donated to the ASF, under the signed Software Grant by Marc Andrew "Drew" Davidson, the original OGNL author. BTW I'll write as well to trademarks@a.o to clarify, thanks for suggesting :) The difference with EL is in the OGNL definition it

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 for a rename. Using an established project name might create problems with > the trademark. Best you ping trademarks@a.o about it. I think, there is a misunderstandment. This is *the* OGNL project, we are talking about and not a followu

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! +1 for a rename. Using an established project name might create problems with the trademark. Best you ping trademarks@a.o about it. Btw: where is the difference between OGNL and EL-2.2 from a practical view? LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 4/8/11, Simone Tripodi wrote: > From: Simone Tripo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Due to a misunderstanding (my bad!!!) I didn't add Jochen Wiedmann in the Mentors list, I already added him in the Mentors List. So now we're looking for at least one more mentor that will help up!!! Volunteers are welcome :) Many thanks in advance Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ htt

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The reference to "Ogre" did cross my mind. But the emphasis is on the "O", not the "a". ;-) On 08.04.2011 10:00:10 Antonio Petrelli wrote: > 2011/4/8 Jeremias Maerki > > > How about > > calling it Apache (Commons) Ogranal? > > > Are you serious? Ogr(e)anal? :-D Jeremias Maerki -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
>> > > I added Apache Tiles, that uses OGNL through an optional module. > > Antonio > Great, thanks!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Jeremias, thanks for your feedback!! Just to make tings clear, there's not OGNL specification, OGNL is the already existing project name, there are only OGNL guides. BTW let us know if you're interested on participating in the future, thanks in advance! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetrip

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2011/4/8 Ioannis Canellos > In the relationship with other Apache Projects section, project iBatis has > been retired. You could add however Apache Camel which is using ognl > expressions for routing/filtering etc. > I added Apache Tiles, that uses OGNL through an optional module. Antonio

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2011/4/8 Jeremias Maerki > How about > calling it Apache (Commons) Ogranal? Are you serious? Ogr(e)anal? :-D

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm sorry that I can't help out but when reading this I thought that using the spec name as the project name is probably not ideal. How about calling it Apache (Commons) Ogranal? Hopefully, this doesn't have any strange meaning in some language. Just a thought. On 08.04.2011 09:26:43 Simone Tripod

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Ioannis Canellos
Hi and good luck with your proposal. please find below my feedback to your proposal. In the relationship with other Apache Projects section, project iBatis has been retired. You could add however Apache Camel which is using ognl expressions for routing/filtering etc. I hope that helps! On Fri,

[DISCUSS] Apache OGNL

2011-04-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'm almost ready to submit a new proposal I'm preparing on Wiki[1] for Apache OGNL. The idea is importing the OGNL project under the Apache umbrella and, once/if ready, be promoted in Apache Commons - the Commons PMC already voted to be the Sponsor. All legal issues have been resolved,