Hi Niall,
>> [...]
>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive".
>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
>>
>
> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.apache.org is
> the archive.
I respectfully disagree.
Cheers,
Chris
>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
>
>>
>> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
>> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
>> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
>> artifact
>
> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
> artifacts in the dist area - they should be linking to a download page
> where
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
>> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> Hmmm,
>>>
>>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e
Sorry to be off the thread, but I had an email mishap.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.1.0-incubating
release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the
release.
In fact we Already have 3 binding IPMC votes recorded on our PMC voting round:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/2011
