+1
Although the initial committers list are all paied by Yahoo, but I
trust that the project will attract a lot of other developers more
specifically from Hadoop family of projects.
Only one note: Do you really need a separate users@ list, I didn't
find in your proposal any pointers to a suitable
+1
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-02-11, Nick Burch wrote:
>
>> I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
>> +1 - I approve of the Chemistry graduation
>> 0 - I've not had time to look into it, sorry
>> -1 - There's an issue with graduation
hat's a completely arbitrary distinction.
>
> As a Labs PMC member at least I would be open to a proposal to change
> that rule, if that's the only thing preventing Labs from being used
> for something like this.
>
In the interests of email economy:
A scheme to do this at the Lab would be fine wi
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
> lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
> and that's a completely arbitrary distinction.
As a Labs PMC member at least I would be
Le 11 févr. 2011 à 17:13, Benson Margulies a écrit :
> Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
> would I proceed?
>
> Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
> lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
> an
Eric,
I don't feel that your reply is fair. I am not 'lowering the bar' to
the eventual creation of a TLP that makes official Apache releases. I
am proposing, if you will excuse the metaphor, to create a less steep
ramp that approaches that bar. Right now, we say 'go away until you
have a substant
As an Apache outsider who has some role in guiding our overall company
use of open-source software, the high-barrier to entry is *precisely*
what makes Apache currently so valuable to us, as a client.
Not sure you want to dilute that.
-Eric.
On 2/11/11 8:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Those
Those have zero oversight, and are supposed to be associated with
existing projects, no?
More seriously,
"There are a number of things Apache Extras projects can not do since
they are not official Apache Software Foundation projects, including
1) include the word Apache in their name, 2) use the
On 2011-02-11, Nick Burch wrote:
> I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
> +1 - I approve of the Chemistry graduation
> 0 - I've not had time to look into it, sorry
> -1 - There's an issue with graduation at this time, which is
+1
Stefan
--
On 2/11/11 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/ ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
and that's a completely arbitrary distinction.
So, these days, my li
+1 from me. (binding)
Congrats guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the
> last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now
> its first sucessful non-Java rel
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> It's my understanding that all voting takes place during a 72 hour period.
> If that period ends on a weekend then it's customary to wait until Monday to
> complete.
>
> I don't see this documented on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pp
Yes, I agree with that. In the example I used, things like master
poms which are infrastructure, or a minor site updates, or fixing
'moved' repositories which wouldn't let things build. Those were our
only real exceptions.
Most changes we give the 72 hours for because if it's deserving of a
rel
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> ...Following advice from the mentors, the Chemistry podling has now voted to
> graduate:...
> I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation
+1
Special kudos for the chemistry and opencmis teams for joining forces
in this p
Hi All
The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the
last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now
its first sucessful non-Java release too. The community is healthy and
diverse, has added new committers, and brought in other code bases + th
Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500:
> On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > Bertrand,
> >
> > I agree. The good thing about a vibrant community is that they
> > generally enforce this. All I'm saying is this shouldn't be a "must"
> > requirement, rather it should be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
