Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone > release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and  is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish the release. > > Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release > artifac

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

My ICLA is signed and on file unlistedclas . -Tad

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: >> > Ian, Isabel (and anyone else I missed), sorry about that -- I manually > compared the list of voters against > http://apache.org/foundation/members.html > (and http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html ) > > Ralph, your list looks more up to

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Tad Glines wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), > once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already > members), one or more of them will initiate: Anyone who has commit access can do the steps.

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > > > Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point > on > > hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. > > > > For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point on > hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. > > For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have them on file. I think we'll > just need to get karma when we get

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Ralph, > > If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and then > later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. Meaning that > previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a subsequ

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point on hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have them on file. I think we'll just need to get karma when we get to that point. FYI -- for the Googlers, there is already a

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Ian Boston wrote: > > > >> > >> On 4 Dec 2010, at 01:50, Tad Glines wrote: > >> > >>> 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > >>> The 18 binding votes: > >>> Andrus Adamchi

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Ralph, If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and then later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. Meaning that previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a subsequent CCLA. If that is the case I would recommend all of the init

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:22 -0800, "Tad Glines" wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), > once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already > members), one or more of them will initiate: > >-

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA >>> or >>> CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the

Facebook page for Zeta Components

Hi, I'd like to create a page on Facebook for the Zeta Components project and wanted to ask if there is anything special to keep in mind (except the official branding guidelines)? I assume that I'm allowed to claim an official Facebook page in the name of Zeta? Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote: Should those of us on the contributor list, just go ahead and get these submitted sooner rather than later? Yes, there's no need to wait for anyone else to do anything else. Contributors should just print, sign, scan, and email their ICL

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Should those of us on the contributor list, just go ahead and get these submitted sooner rather than later? On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, committers will not

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > >> >> Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA >> or >> CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: >> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-commi

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Ian Boston wrote: > >> >> On 4 Dec 2010, at 01:50, Tad Glines wrote: >> >>> 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson >>> The 18 binding votes: >>> Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. >>> Mat

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Ian Boston wrote: > > On 4 Dec 2010, at 01:50, Tad Glines wrote: > >> 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson >> The 18 binding votes: >> Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. >> Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Do

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On 4 Dec 2010, at 01:50, Tad Glines wrote: > 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > The 18 binding votes: > Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. > Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug Cutting, > Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Mil

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA or CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html. I'm fairly certain all committers needs to fill

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.7-incubating (rc2)

Signatures are ok source builds rat report looks good. +1 Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Tad, Thanks. We had reviewed that page, I suppose what I was looking for was some clarity on who would be taking the lead on that and when we should expect to start certain activities. ~Michael On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

According to this ( http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already members), one or more of them will initiate: - the reporting schedule; - the project status

Re: Emeritus w/r/t podlings?

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > The River podling is cleaning up the list in preparation for (I hope) > a graduation soon. > > Do they need to maintain 'emeritus' status across the graduation > boundary? They'd rather not. They have a long list of long-gone > people. I

Wave Incubator Next Steps

Wave Mentors, What are the logistics of boostrapping the Wave Podling? I assume most of the initial committers on the wave project do not have Apache Accounts already. I assume over the next several days we will start that process. Is there a good document that describes the boostraping proc

Emeritus w/r/t podlings?

The River podling is cleaning up the list in preparation for (I hope) a graduation soon. Do they need to maintain 'emeritus' status across the graduation boundary? They'd rather not. They have a long list of long-gone people. - T

Please add me back to the incubator PMC

Following the standard procedure for members I ask to be added again to the Incubator PMC. As I'm mentoring the Wave proposal I will be around again for some time. Regards Santiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@i