Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Lacking a lot of binding votes... +1 binding On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can > be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied > below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 non-binding On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can > be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied > below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care > [ ] -1 R

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Emmanuel Lecharny and all... You are right, this is why this kind of meetings are not related to decisions making in general, they are just like an online get-together/meetup, they are optional not mandatory to attend, and no decisions are taken in them, just brain storming, comments, ideas

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Olivier Grisel
+1 [non-binding] -- Olivier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 11/19/10 11:52 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: ...if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide to run a regular Skype meeting to meet each other electronically assuming +) that the meeting is announced on the dev list

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:55 PM, James Carman wrote: > I'm just trying to make sure we do things the "Apache Way", since I'm > supposed to be a "mentor" for this project And it's great that podling members are discussing such things here. The ASF is not here to impose any useless rules on p

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread James Carman
I'm just trying to make sure we do things the "Apache Way", since I'm supposed to be a "mentor" for this project. On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > open source projects are done by individuals. And individuals like to > communicate during long & lonely nigh

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > ...if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide to run a regular > Skype meeting to meet each other electronically assuming > > +) that the meeting is announced on the dev list > > +) that we not exclude any interested party

[ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, open source projects are done by individuals. And individuals like to communicate during long & lonely nights in front of the keyboard. And meeting the other ISIS developers is difficult since the are spread around the globe. So if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Doug Cutting
+1 Sounds like a great project! Doug On 11/19/2010 01:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hi, lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal and a copy is included below. The disc

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Craig L Russell
On Nov 19, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Greg Stein wrote: A full transcription shouldn't be necessary. I agree. Transcript is too strong for what I think needs to be done, which is... Just bring a summary of discussion points back to the list, along with any recommendations. The list can then sort

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > So Skype calls are fine (and I like Craig's list of criteria for > them), but as far as the ASF is concerned they don't count - anything > important has to happen on list. Audio transcripts are useless IMO. > Right, the key criteria

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > ...We have off-list discussions all the time (IM, IRC, in-person). We > don't transcribe those. We just bring the discussion onto the list for > wrapping it up with everybody present. Skype concalls are no different > than these other forums

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Greg Stein
A full transcription shouldn't be necessary. Just bring a summary of discussion points back to the list, along with any recommendations. The list can then sort through it and make decisions. We have off-list discussions all the time (IM, IRC, in-person). We don't transcribe those. We just bring th

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi James! Thanks for your comments! I share the same caveat as stated on the list already. All decision making must be done on the list. We only used skype (horrible tool from the technical aspect btw) to introduce ourselfs and dan gave us a introduction about the platform corner stones and fea

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread Craig L Russell
My $0.02: The business of Apache is conducted on email. It's fine to have a periodic conference call among interested project participants, as long as (my list, not normative): no project or community member is excluded (e.g. by posting the call information only to a private list) no dec

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Matt Benson
On Nov 19, 2010, at 3:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > and a copy is included below. > > The discussion thread

Re: Conference call

2010-11-19 Thread James Carman
I don't know about this. Whatever we do has to be trackable and "open", so I don't know about this Skype stuff. Requiring folks to watch a video or listen to an audio recording rather than reading a transcript is probably not a good idea. I'm copying the general list to see what others have to s

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 [not binding] Tommaso 2010/11/19 Sander W G van der Waal > +1 (non-binding) > > Sander > > > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org] > > Sent: 17 November 2010 13:10 > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator > > > > Please vote on the acce

RE: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Sander W G van der Waal
+1 (non-binding) Sander > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org] > Sent: 17 November 2010 13:10 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator > > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal > can be found at http://wiki.a

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenNLP Project

2010-11-19 Thread Jason Baldridge
I'm resending this as I had neglected to sign up for the incubator mailing list before. -Jason On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jason Baldridge wrote: > Cool. As one of the creators of OpenNLP (as part of my PhD work ten years > ago), I'm always happy to hear it is used in other projects! > > I'

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 Mike On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > and a copy is included below. > > The discussi

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > On 19 Nov 2010, at 10:48 , Jörn Kottmann wrote: > >> lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation >> at the Apache Incubator. > > +1 > > Greetings, Marcel > > > ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Marcel Offermans
On 19 Nov 2010, at 10:48 , Jörn Kottmann wrote: > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. +1 Greetings, Marcel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 19, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > and a copy is included below. > > The discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Regards Felix Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 13:10 + schrieb Ross Gardler: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal > can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is > copied below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Nick Kew
On 19 Nov 2010, at 09:48, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Accept OpenNLP for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: +1 OpenNLP is a bit after my time, but I was familiar with the Edinburgh speech&language folks when I was doing relate

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-19 Thread Nick Kew
On 17 Nov 2010, at 13:10, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can be > found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Reject for the following

Re: Question about "keyset does not exist" error when running .NET Stonehenge

2010-11-19 Thread Thilo Götz
This is indeed not the right place. See http://incubator.apache.org/stonehenge/mail-lists.html You'll want the dev list. --Thilo On 11/18/2010 22:24, Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms) wrote: > Hello, > > > > In case this is not the right place to ask questions, please direct me > to

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Marshall Schor
[x] +1 Accept OpenNLP for incubation (non-binding) -Marshall Schor On 11/19/2010 4:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal

Question about "keyset does not exist" error when running .NET Stonehenge

2010-11-19 Thread Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms)
Hello, In case this is not the right place to ask questions, please direct me to the right list. My issue: * I select the "Account" tab from the Trader Client page, it redirects me to the Passive STS page * On the Passive STS page, I enter uid:0 and xxx * When I c

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Thilo Götz
On 11/19/2010 10:48, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > and a copy is included below. > > The discussion thread can be fou

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 [not binding] Tommaso 2010/11/19 Jörn Kottmann > Hi, > > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is on the wiki > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > and a copy is included below. > > The discussion thread ca

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation > at the Apache Incubator. [x] +1 Accept OpenNLP for incubation BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe

[VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

2010-11-19 Thread Jörn Kottmann
Hi, lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal and a copy is included below. The discussion thread can be found here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-g

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenNLP Project

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > > ...The proposal can be found here: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal Looks good to me, IMO you're good to start the vote. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenNLP Project

2010-11-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal > > Out of curiosity: Are there noteworthy relations to these projects? > > Apache Stanbol > Apache Jena > Apache Clerezza As Olivier indicated, the IKS code that will become Stanbol does

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenNLP Project

2010-11-19 Thread Jörn Kottmann
The Named Entity Recognizer can be used to find mentions of certain entity types in a document/article. For example it can detect the spans in a text which contain person names. The output could look like this: Pierre Vinken will join the board as a ... As far as I understand, after detecting