Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Mohammad Nour El-Din, On Nov 17, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi Craig... I think this is not a formal vote, no disagreement it is like an acceptance vote no disagreement before going into the formality of a real vote, and before we go into a real vote we need t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
+1 (non-binding) Cheers, Andreas --- Am 17.11.2010 14:10, schrieb Ross Gardler: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. > The proposal can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care >

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Craig... I think this is not a formal vote, it is like an acceptance vote before going into the formality of a real vote, so the voting thread is not full of a lot of *dicussion* e-mails which can drift the voting thread away from its purpose :). On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Ru

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread Craig L Russell
Assuming that no one comes forward with a significant reason to disallow this, I'd just request that you not call a VOTE until you have an update to the incubator page that describes the process. In other words, let's DISCUSS and then VOTE on the change to the process page. Craig On Nov

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread David Jencks
+1 (with the one required mentor/IPMC vote and notifying private@) david jencks On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: > +1 from me. > > I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK > with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 @ Benson, so if that only one vote is not there, the vote is not accepted. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1 to the proposal. > >> What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one >> mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar for ASF >> commi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, ant elder wrote: > +1 > >   ...ant > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can >> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Wink 1.1.2 release

2010-11-17 Thread Raymond Feng
Congratulations! We (Tuscany project) just moved to the latest release and it works smoothly. The nicer thing is that we can remove some of the workarounds that are now fixed. :-) Thanks, Raymond Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apac

RE: Dormant projects to mothball? (was missing reports ...)

2010-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Does the Apache Foundation provides some guidelines to fill it? Yes. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comman

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wink 1.1.2 release

2010-11-17 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
The Apache Wink project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Wink 1.1.2-incubating. We have quite a few new features, including: Improvements * WINK-287 - Support web beans / (J)CDI / JSR-299 * WINK-295 - Upgrade to SLF4J 1.6.0 * WINK-296 - DEBUG -> TRACE logging reform *

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can > be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied > below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Rej

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
+1 (non binding) On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can >> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied >> belo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Raphael Volz
+1 very established framework in the Semantics Web area. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can >> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can > be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied > below. > > [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation > [ ] +0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Reject for the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

2010-11-17 Thread Ross Gardler
Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied below. [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: The vote is open for at least 72 hours. Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 to the proposal. > What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one > mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar for ASF > committership can now be defined solely by a group of people who might > have no knowledge, as yet, of "the Apache way" in general and the way > meri

Re: Dormant projects to mothball? (was missing reports ...)

2010-11-17 Thread Chapuis Bertil
I am using droids to build and update a dataset used for social network analysis. I also plan some work in 2011 to use it as an easy to install and easy to configure enterprise resource crawler (intranet, extranet, samba shares, ftp, etc.). On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote

RE: Dormant projects to mothball? (was missing reports ...)

2010-11-17 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:34 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... > > > I am ATM to busy to organize my personal (third child born) and my > > professional live (new company) that I do not come to spend any time > > on any projects let alone Droids. > > Congratulations on y

Re: [IP-CLEARANCE] Bushel Donation to Apache Ant

2010-11-17 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Le 17 nov. 2010 à 00:30, Christopher Brind a écrit : > Apologies if this is not the place to discuss this, but I notice on the > Bushel Google Code page that it only honours "require-bundle", is that still > the case? > > Are there plans to support import/export package soon (since package level