Big +1 from me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 6:36 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of
the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
http://wi
On 09/11/2010 00:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
I use Jena at my day-job, so if there's a mentor shortage you can draft me.
Actual users as mentors is great news. My team uses Jena, but I myself
do not so knowledgeable mentors are important. Your on the list.
Ross
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:36
I use Jena at my day-job, so if there's a mentor shortage you can draft me.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
> accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
> proposal is copi
On 08/11/2010 23:49, Dave wrote:
This is excellent news and a good proposal. I'm a Jena user myself and
would like to volunteer as a mentor for the new podling, if an
additional hand is needed.
I've added you as a mentor - thanks
Ross
- Dave
On Monday, November 8, 2010, Ross Gardler wrot
This is excellent news and a good proposal. I'm a Jena user myself and
would like to volunteer as a mentor for the new podling, if an
additional hand is needed.
- Dave
On Monday, November 8, 2010, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
>
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of
the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal
We currently have two mentors so we'
On 08/11/10 17:30, Ian Dickinson wrote:
Hi Donald,
On 08/11/10 17:01, Donald Whytock wrote:
Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
semantic.apache.org?
I looked around in db.apache.org and I couldn't see anything that said
what the goals of that project are, sepa
On 08/11/10 18:32, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
To make the commons discussion more concrete I would suggest the
following items for the commons:
- an IRI library
- some code to do with vocabularies.
- connecting to a URL and doing semweb aware content negotiation (this
is typically done badly)
(Act
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
> semantic.apache.org?...
That's a possibility, but I would keep such a website for information
that's common to ASF semantic projects, as opposed to making it an
umbrella p
Indeed this iPhone is a pain in so many ways. Even worse I seem to have become
blind to so many of it's "useful" corrections.
I suppose "sharing of appropriate code" makes more sense than sharif, but I
wouldn't mind having Omar around if that can be pulled off.
Sent from my mobile device.
On
On 11/8/2010 7:14 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
There is a depedency relationship:
- Stanbol is a of application level HTTP services and set of OSGi
components that use:
- Clerezza as an OSGi service provider which in turn is using:
- Jena as a lib for parsing and serializing RDF models and as a SP
To make the commons discussion more concrete I would suggest the
following items for the commons:
- an IRI library
- some code to do with vocabularies.
- connecting to a URL and doing semweb aware content negotiation (this
is typically done badly)
(Actually the IRI code should probably be wi
I sense an iPhone at work here.
Would that be Omar Sharif?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> For me this proposal means we should be aware of possibilities. There is no
> intention of forcing collaboration on incubating projects. Each project
> should continue to work on it
For me this proposal means we should be aware of possibilities. There is no
intention of forcing collaboration on incubating projects. Each project should
continue to work on it's own graduation.
However there will probably be code that fan be shared. The sharif of
appropriate code can only se
Hi Donald,
On 08/11/10 17:01, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
> semantic.apache.org?
I looked around in db.apache.org and I couldn't see anything that said
what the goals of that project are, separate from the goals of the
individual sub-
Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
semantic.apache.org?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>> ...Bertrand wrote:
>>...
2. A Semantic Commons area is created for commo
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ian Dickinson wrote:
> ...Bertrand wrote:
>...
>>> 2. A Semantic Commons area is created for common code between these
>>> (and other) projects. Details to be discussed, this does probably not
>>> warrant a separate Apache project, but might be managed by C
On 08/11/10 15:09, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Wow! Jena is proposing to come to Apache??!
Yep, the proposal has been under discussion for some time within the
project, and Ross is now taking the lead in bringing it publicly into
the incubator process.
Bertrand wrote:
>> 1. Clerezza, Stanbo
On 8/11/2010 3:42, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi Jerome,
Any reason why you didn't follow Incubator process as Bertrand suggested?
I missed Bertrand's point. Issue solved, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChaupalProposal
I am the single point of contact for the JXTA community regarding movi
Correction: actually not sure about 2003 but seems like we been using it for
that long!
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:09:13
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: "general@incubat
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 15:54, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>... 1. Clerezza, Stanbol and Jena are independent podlings, each aiming
>> for top-level status
>
> There is a depedency relationship:...
Agreed - I meant independent communities, code
On 8 November 2010 15:54, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm following up on discussions here regarding relationships between
> the incubating Clerezza podling and incoming Stanbol and Jena podlings
> (see proposals at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator).
>
> Do people agree with the following
Wow! Jena is proposing to come to Apache??! Sweet! We've used it in OODT since
2003...looking forward to it!
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 7:04 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
As champion for Jena I agree in principle. I can't speak for the Jena team if
course, but representatives are tracking this lis
As champion for Jena I agree in principle. I can't speak for the Jena team if
course, but representatives are tracking this list and have started discussing
in their project list.
I will be making the formal Jena proposal here very soon (just as soon as I'm
not limited to the iPhone) - its in
Hi,
I'm following up on discussions here regarding relationships between
the incubating Clerezza podling and incoming Stanbol and Jena podlings
(see proposals at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator).
Do people agree with the following structure?
1. Clerezza, Stanbol and Jena are independent podling
Hi Jerome,
Any reason why you didn't follow Incubator process as Bertrand suggested?
We'd be happy to get feedback to know where our documentation[1] is
unclear or lacking detail.
The mailing list archive is also full of best practices of successful
incubation requests.
Thanks,
Bernd
[1] http
26 matches
Mail list logo
