Thanks for the note Chris.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
> VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
>
> Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> [1]
Looks like the 4th time is the charm.
+1 to release OODT 0.1-incubating
Cameron
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
> >
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> >
> >
> > gratz.
>
--
-S
>
>
>
> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
>
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
>
> gratz.
You could tag both the RC and the final (GA) release. (That's what
Subversion does.)
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 15:18:29 -0700:
> Hey Jukka,
>
> We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine.
> The intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC
+1 to release RC4
--Paul Ramirez
On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
> VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
>
> Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> [1] http://bit.ly/d
+1 to release RC4
-brian
On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
> VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
>
> Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> [1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid
>
Hey Jukka,
We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine. The
intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC branch is created first, then
VOTE'd on, if we find issues then we update the branch as needed and call
another VOTE. Once the VOTE passes, we "tag" the blessed br
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on
> after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Why wait? The vote is about this exact set of bits, so everything's
already in svn.
BR,
Jukka Zitti
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid
On 11/1/10 2:19 PM, "Justin Erenkrantz" wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> The release doesn't need to be tagged?
It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag:
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
>
> FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is
> 41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wrote:
>> The relea
Hi,
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is
41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wrote:
> The release was made from the OODT 0.1-incubating branch (r1028792) at:
> htt
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, david woollard wrote:
> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
Just did a visual comparison (diff -ru) between RC1 and RC4. Changes look fine.
+1 for release.
Thanks. -- justin
---
Hi Dave,
+1!
Signature checks out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/oodtrc4] mattmann% gpg --verify
apache-oodt-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Sun Oct 31 14:07:08 2010 PDT using RSA key ID FF5B0BD5
gpg: Good signature from "David Woollard (CODE SIGNING KEY)
"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not ce
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ard Schrijvers
> wrote:
>>... I would interested to help out as a committer. I have been involved
>> already through the IKS project, and am particularly interested now
>> the code base migh
Dear Kitty Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 November 2010, 12 pm Pacific. The
report
for your po
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
> ...The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of
> components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one
> of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and set of components
>
(restarting thread with general@incubator.apache.org hoping for a broader
discussion)
Hello
The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of
components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one
of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and s
IBM Uk Winchester Hursley ?
On 28 Oct 2010, at 16:42, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Which would appear to come from the UK, if that gives anyone a better
> clue.
>
> On 10/28/2010 10:15 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Sorry for the noise. A bit more information:
>>
>> Caller-ID: 441962815000
>>
Hi Ard,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ard Schrijvers
wrote:
>... I would interested to help out as a committer. I have been involved
> already through the IKS project, and am particularly interested now
> the code base might move into an Apache incubator project
Sure, thanks for your int
20 matches
Mail list logo
