Hi Noel,
On 27 September 2010 18:18, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> So why aren't you looking at SCA? From where I sit, you'd be best to work
> with C bindings for SCA, and let the SCA adapters manage remote protocols.
Exactly this discussion was held when the OSGi Remote Services (now
chapter 13 of
Hello Alois team,
welcome to Apache!
I have just added ALOIS to the Incubator website, which will appear
there in a few hours. The status site will guide us through the
incubation process.
However, before we request your accounts and infrastuff, can you
please check if you have already signed an
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> the CXF project is named as dependency to test the remote services
>> in combination with other java based OSGi implementations.
>> The C part should be in C, and Axis2/C seems a good candidate. But at the
>> moment we are also looking at
> the CXF project is named as dependency to test the remote services
> in combination with other java based OSGi implementations.
> The C part should be in C, and Axis2/C seems a good candidate. But at the
> moment we are also looking at other, lighter, protocols to use.
So why aren't you looking
Hi,
Thanks for the notice. We have send the faxes for Sertan Alkan's ICLA for
the Gora at Incubator. He can scan and mail the documents instead. Sorry for
the trouble.
Thanks,
Enis Soztutar
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the wide distribution,
Hi,
Apologies for the wide distribution, but I expect that someone on
these lists might know the sender. I did not find any public
correspondence on the usual mail lists...
We've received two blank faxes presumably from ODTU KOSGEB. If these
are intended to be documents to be filed, pleas
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
+1
To more or less quote Joe S on this subject ...
The purpose of the incubation process is to support and supervise the
podling *behaving like a PMC*.
Even though PPMC actions are formally nonbinding (with the exception
of the cur
On 9/27/2010 2:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> But you're right that those votes have no formal value.
I would disagree, if there were later discussion by the graduated project
(now consisting mostly of former PPMC folks), as a PMC chair I'd look back
at the decision by the committee partic
On 9/25/2010 8:42 PM, Rafal Rusin wrote:
>
> This is good question. As I understand procedure for nominating
> committers for podlings, blind request to hise-private needs to be
> sent and then mentors decide during voting. Existing committers don't
> play role here. That's why we haven't started
Hi Sanjiva,
Sorry for the confusion, the CXF project is named as dependency to test the
remote services in combination with other java based OSGi implementations.
The C part should be in C, and Axis2/C seems a good candidate. But at the
moment we are also looking at other, lighter, protocols to us
Alexander, I'm confused about the remote API aspect- since Celix is in C why
would you implement the remote API in Java with CXF? Why wouldn't you use
Axis2/C?
Sanjiva.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to announce the following proposal as a
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> So, just to be clear here as to current policy...
>
> The only binding votes that matter with respect to new committers are in fact
> Incubator PMC members - therefore for now, all three of Matthieu, Paul, and
> myself would need to +1 a new c
12 matches
Mail list logo
