I've had a look, and it all looks good. The licensing and legal doc in
the artifacts looks fine, the sigs verify, src builds etc.
+1
...ant
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMC members,
> on behalf of the Chemistry dev team, I'd like to ask your appr
Some weeks back, we posted a proposal for the gXML project.
We've gotten a lot of excellent feedback from people who contact us in
response to that proposal, and from people we've contacted directly.
Thanks to all who have sent us feedback! We've gotten close to what
might work for an Apach
Hi Craig
Thanks for you input and your vote.
In my view, the chat is not a must, but a proposition. I understand your
concern and I certainly will keep it in mind. But since ALOIS should
become a community project, I still think the followers of it should
decide which communication channell they
On 16 September 2010 23:55, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro
> wrote:
>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> The window closes tomorrow.
AFAIK the 72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum.
> We're still one IPMC vote short and I
> believe Gianugo (ou
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
The window closes tomorrow. We're still one IPMC vote short and I
believe Gianugo (our third mentor) is understandably pretty busy with
other stuff right now. It would be great if someone else from the
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 21:32 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> > ...I'm interested in what others think of their proposal for supporting
> > real-time communication, and curious what others are doing, if anything, to
> > support the growing i
Thanks Senaka, we always appreciate the help.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
> +1.
>
> Matthew, by the way, I'd like to contribute to this project.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:50 PM, msacks wrote:
>
>> At the advisement of the list, we have crea
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> ...I'm interested in what others think of their proposal for supporting
> real-time communication, and curious what others are doing, if anything, to
> support the growing interest in real-time communication between project
> participants
I understand the concern raised by the use of real-time communication for
Apache projects - that decisions may be made off-list, and that folks who
aren't a party to the real-time communication do not have the opportunity to
benefit from or impact the decisions that result from the real-time
commun
Hi Urs,
My only concern is the request to have a chat channel. There's wide
use of chat channels in Apache (the periodic board and members'
meetings make use of them, and infrastructure uses channels to
advantage).
But for an incubating project, I'd strongly discourage use of chat as
a
I think it is often a sign of "I don't care either way", when no one
responds. At least this is my take on projects; If I don't care, I
won't stop others from embracing, and silently say nothing.
Cheers
Niclas
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> All,
>
> this vote will
Hi Tim
Thanks for your interest and thanks to Christian for his effort.
So far the project and therefore the code had only be used in two
organizations. Therefore, the project is like closed, although licenced
under the GPL. There is really almost no usable documentation (at least
in English, bec
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 7:40:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies
>wrote:
> > ...It takes about two minutes to make a JIRA. I
Hey Enis,
No worries, I just thought of this myself, so just thinking out loud here.
Welcome to everyone, indeed! Hopefully we can use this critical mass to really
springboard Gora!
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/16/10 6:55 AM, "Enis Soztutar" wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mattmann, Chri
Hi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Enis,
>
> Thanks. Let’s leave the VOTE open until Friday evening Pacific time to give
> folks time to look at the proposal. Technically we didn’t do a VOTE thread
> on this yet though and I s
Hi Enis,
Thanks. Let’s leave the VOTE open until Friday evening Pacific time to give
folks time to look at the proposal. Technically we didn’t do a VOTE thread on
this yet though and I saw that some folks just asked Kitty to explicitly post a
[VOTE] thread, so we may want to do that here.
What
Thanks to everyone who have shown interest in the project.
I think Chris added all, who has indicated their support as committers. On
behalf of the initial comitters, welcome on board : )
Just FYI in case you want to start contributing right away, we use github as
the collaboration tool until we
+1
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> All,
>
> this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
> there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
> ignored?
>
> Best regards,
> Christian
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Urs Lerc
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> ...It takes about two minutes to make a JIRA. If
> the contributor can't spare those two minutes, how are they having time to
> make a patch at all?...
> ...Perhaps this is because I'm accustomed, at both my day job and on several
> Apach
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> All,
>
> this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
> there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
> ignored?
Hi Christian,
I ignored it because it was odd to me that there's essentially no
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> ...this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
> there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
> ignored?...
72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum, so no real problem.
I'll have a look until
All,
this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
ignored?
Best regards,
Christian
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi everybody out there
>
> The vote for ALOIS ends in about 24 hours. A
22 matches
Mail list logo
