Re: [VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

2010-09-15 Thread Senaka Fernando
+1. Matthew, by the way, I'd like to contribute to this project. Thanks, Senaka. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:50 PM, msacks wrote: > At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here > for voting on the kitty proposal. > The wiki page is located at: > http://wiki.apache.org/

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread Upayavira
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:41 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > > > > > This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything > > is too much work on the part of the contributer. > > > On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way > within the l

Re: [VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

2010-09-15 Thread Pid
On 15/09/2010 08:27, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > +1 (Not binding) Another +1 (non-binding) p > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, msacks wrote: >> At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here >> for voting on the kitty proposal. >> The wiki page is located at: http:/

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message > From: Craig L Russell > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 8:05:01 PM > Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling > > > On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > - Original Message > > > >> From: David Lutter

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread Craig L Russell
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: David Lutterkort To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: FWIW, what Subv

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread Benson Margulies
> > > > This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything > is too much work on the part of the contributer. On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way within the light constraints of the license policy. On the other hand, I am honestly mysti

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message > From: David Lutterkort > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM > Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling > > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > FWIW, what Subversion uses: > > > > >http://subvers

Re: Accepting patches in a podling

2010-09-15 Thread David Lutterkort
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > FWIW, what Subversion uses: > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patches > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patch-manager > > Briefly, all patches go to dev@, and

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

2010-09-15 Thread Urs Lerch
Hi everybody out there The vote for ALOIS ends in about 24 hours. Are there any more comments or votes? We would appreciate it to get to know your opinion. Best Urs Am Montag, den 13.09.2010, 11:33 -0400 schrieb Urs Lerch: > Hi > > Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more ment

Re: [VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

2010-09-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (Not binding) On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, msacks wrote: > At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here > for voting on the kitty proposal. > The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal > > Thanks. > > -

[VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

2010-09-15 Thread msacks
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here for voting on the kitty proposal. The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs

Re: Creating a podling site

2010-09-15 Thread msacks
Thanks Upayavira: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Upayavira wrote: > As I understand it, Kitty has not yet been accepted, and therefore is > not yet a podling, so the SVN steps below are premature. > > You should create a proposal on the incubator