Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:06:24 -0400:
> Sorry to go on and on, but this ***is*** gene...@***incubator***. We're
> supposed to promulgate good community practices to new podlings. I didn't
> and don't mean to be dictating anything to nonP-PMCs. I stand by a position
> of rec
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:03:12 -0400:
> However, I thank Joe for pointing out that I was careful to avoid stating a
> requirement when I didn't know that one existed.
>
Thanks for clarifying. To summarize, having all patches go via JIRA is
one possible way of working, bu
Sorry to go on and on, but this ***is*** gene...@***incubator***. We're
supposed to promulgate good community practices to new podlings. I didn't
and don't mean to be dictating anything to nonP-PMCs. I stand by a position
of recommending JIRA as a process for an ordinary new podling, bootstrapping
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> He says should, not must. Mailing lists are contribution
> mechanisms as well (per the license), so patches submitted
> there which aren't marked "Not a contribution" are acceptable.
> Jira's checkbox is the belt and suspenders approach.
>
T
He says should, not must. Mailing lists are contribution
mechanisms as well (per the license), so patches submitted
there which aren't marked "Not a contribution" are acceptable.
Jira's checkbox is the belt and suspenders approach.
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Shahaf
> To: genera
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
Seriously?
1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to just say thankyou and
commit the patches. A few times, with large-scale contributions (eg:
someone sent us an SQL backend), we have required filing an ICLA first
--- but that
David,
Yes, current practice is exactly what Benson outlined.
thanks,
dims
On 09/13/2010 08:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the cl
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:55 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> What is the offical proces
What is the offical process for accepting patches from non-comitters in
a podling ? Is it enough to insist that contributors that are not
committers have a CLA on file or do I also have to make them file each
patch in jira ?
David
On 13/09/2010 14:35, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
>> Calling out for more ;)
>
> Echoing Bertrand's comment, people may have been waiting for a [VOTE]
> thread.
A VOTE is a good idea. :)
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Hi Everyone,
Sorry about the spam.
Since Sept 12, 2010, I have not received any email from all of my
Apache subscriptions such as *...@lucene.apache.org, or
*...@incubator.apache.org or *...@apache.org and I have several of them
which Im subscribed to (all of Solrs mailing list, all of L
As I understand it, Kitty has not yet been accepted, and therefore is
not yet a podling, so the SVN steps below are premature.
You should create a proposal on the incubator wiki, at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
There are many examples there you can draw inspiration from.
Upayav
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Matthew Sacks
wrote:
> b) Here is the process for creating a podling site, as I understand it:
>
> 1) svn update
> 2) cd incubator
> 3) cp site-author/projects/someproject.xml site-author/projects/kitty.xml
> 4) vi kitty.xml (add content)
> 5) svn status -v
> 6)
+1 (Not binding)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> My +1 to this proposal, but we certainly need at least one more mentor,
> please, if you’re interested sign up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 9/13/10 6:10 AM, "Enis Soztutar" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
+1 (Not binding)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more mentors were
> asked), I would like to call a second vote for accepting the security
> information and event management tool "ALOIS" for incubation in the
> Apache
Hi
Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more mentors were
asked), I would like to call a second vote for accepting the security
information and event management tool "ALOIS" for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. Thanks Christian Grobmeier we now have two mentors at
least. But any
I'd like to create a podling site for kitty according to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html, although I've never done this
before so any help is appreciated.
a) Is it acceptable for us to create a wiki page for the proposal at this point
for the kitty proposal?
b) Here is the proces
+1 from me (binding)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
>
> Calling out for more ;)
>
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>
>> Hello, Peary Chiu and myself would like to announce the Proposal for the
>> Ki
My +1 to this proposal, but we certainly need at least one more mentor, please,
if you’re interested sign up.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/13/10 6:10 AM, "Enis Soztutar" wrote:
Hi all,
We would like to announce the Proposal for Gora, an ORM for Colum Stores,
for the Apache Incubation. We bel
> So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
> Calling out for more ;)
Echoing Bertrand's comment, people may have been waiting for a [VOTE]
thread.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@in
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
It's a proposal, not a vote, right?
I think it's fine to move forward with the vote if there are no
pending issues (haven't checked).
-Bertrand
> Calling out for more ;)
>
> On Sep 7
+1
sound neat - and I'm really eager to check the groovy port ;)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 9/13/10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Subject: Looking for a few more votes... Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the
> Incubator
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: "Peary Chiu" , "Pi
I have this vote passing 6 to 4 (binding).
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
Calling out for more ;)
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote:
> Hello, Peary Chiu and myself would like to announce the Proposal for the
> Kitty, Production Tomcat utility. Our proposal is as follows (we have also
> attached a P
Hi all,
We would like to announce the Proposal for Gora, an ORM for Colum Stores,
for the Apache Incubation. We believe that Gora can find a nice home at
Apache.
Wiki of the proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GoraProposal
The proposal is as below.
= Gora Proposal for Apa
25 matches
Mail list logo
