Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator)

2010-09-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > For reference: > > * Subversion created its dev list in April 2000. > * The user list was created in July 2003. 238 messages were posted that month. > > As you can see, we waited a very long time before sending users to > their own list. Our dev

Re: Deltacloud Mentors, an Infra issue requires your attention.

2010-09-10 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 09/10/2010 05:31 AM, Gav... wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2867 Thanks :-) Gav... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incub

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > > To be clear, we where asking for a [VOTE] and not a [DISCUSS] - we > wanted the vote to ratify our own vote on the subject. There was already > a long discussion on general and the connectors mailing list - tons of > discussion actually. At t

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread Mark Miller
On 9/10/10 8:18 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > another small comment: if folks only like to get an opinion, then don't call > a [VOTE] but instead a [DISCUSS] opinion poll. > > Because a vote is a vote is a vote... > > LieGrue, > strub To be clear, we where asking for a [VOTE] and not a [DISCUSS] -

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread Mark Struberg
another small comment: if folks only like to get an opinion, then don't call a [VOTE] but instead a [DISCUSS] opinion poll. Because a vote is a vote is a vote... LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 9/10/10, James Carman wrote: > From: James Carman > Subject: Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes > To: gene

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tim Williams wrote: > > That vote is majority rules, so the IPMC could in effect overrule the > project - the "preference/opinion" had already previously been > gathered.  In any case, I was using that instance to ask the broader > question of why we (IPMC) get bin

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread James Carman
For this type of vote, my -1 just means I'm against. It's not a veto. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > James can I interpret your statement that this would rather be a -0 or -0.1? > Stating that there is no veto but that you personally don't like it ;) > > LieGrue, > stru

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread Tim Williams
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:11, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman >>> wrote: >>> I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a >>> sl

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

2010-09-10 Thread Mark Struberg
James can I interpret your statement that this would rather be a -0 or -0.1? Stating that there is no veto but that you personally don't like it ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 9/9/10, James Carman wrote: > From: James Carman > Subject: Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes > To: general@incubator.ap

Deltacloud Mentors, an Infra issue requires your attention.

2010-09-10 Thread Gav...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2867 Thanks :-) Gav... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org