On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote:
>
>> Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
>> Tomcat Connector?
>
> Looks pretty distinct to me.
I agree, the risk that people confuse those two seems very low.
E
On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Could I shake an opinion out of anyone else here? I'm having trouble
wrapping my intuition around,
"Person X sent email saying, I'm not going to participate any longer.'
but we're going to keep him on the committer list anyhow."
The commit
>
> The PMC chair is responsible for updating the permissions file - and
> has the karma to do so.
> Details are in the file header comments.
OK, I didn't know that.
>
>> Could you please comment on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2948 to make them happy?
>>
>> --benson
>>
>>
On 24 August 2010 03:00, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Noel,
>
> Adding me to the PMC didn't add me to the ldap group so that I could
> update the web site. I opened a ticket, but sebb points out that this
> was an act of lese majesty, and the request needs to come from you.
That's not quite what I m
Noel,
Adding me to the PMC didn't add me to the ldap group so that I could
update the web site. I opened a ticket, but sebb points out that this
was an act of lese majesty, and the request needs to come from you.
Could you please comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2948 to make
On 24 August 2010 02:50, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Many graduating projects trim their list of committers / ppmc members,
> primarily because the list of initial committers rarely reflects the active
> people on the project.
>
> In your case just ask infra to remove the committer from the project ac
On Monday 23 August 2010 8:24:48 pm Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> > Luciano,
> >
> > A River committer has indicated a lack of interest in remaining
> > involved. Emeritus status seems overkill in a podling, but that's just
> > my opinion. Sin
Many graduating projects trim their list of committers / ppmc members,
primarily because the list of initial committers rarely reflects the active
people on the project.
In your case just ask infra to remove the committer from the project acl.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:44 PM, B
Could I shake an opinion out of anyone else here? I'm having trouble
wrapping my intuition around,
"Person X sent email saying, I'm not going to participate any longer.'
but we're going to keep him on the committer list anyhow." I would
further expect that the initial PMC would consist of people w
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Luciano,
>
> A River committer has indicated a lack of interest in remaining
> involved. Emeritus status seems overkill in a podling, but that's just
> my opinion. Since this is an active expression of dis-interest, the
> 'how long' questi
+1
-- dims
On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> I'm very happy to see Patricia contributing so enthusiastically.
>
> +1
>
> Craig
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
>> enthusiasti
On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote:
> Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
> Tomcat Connector?
Looks pretty distinct to me.
>
>
> p
>
> On 18 Aug 2010, at 16:17, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just
I'm very happy to see Patricia contributing so enthusiastically.
+1
Craig
On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
enthusiastic contributor.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jukka Zitting
Date: Mon
We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
enthusiastic contributor.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jukka Zitting
Date: Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:22 PM
Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Patricia Shanahan for committer account
To: river-priv...@incubator.apache.org
H
Luciano,
A River committer has indicated a lack of interest in remaining
involved. Emeritus status seems overkill in a podling, but that's just
my opinion. Since this is an active expression of dis-interest, the
'how long' question seems not too relevant to me.
As part of cleaning them up for gra
72 hours has passed, so this vote is closed.
We had 4 +1 votes and no -1 votes, so the vote passes. Thanks to everyone
that voted!
-Bryan
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1
>
> On Aug 20, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:51
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> What's the protocol when a committer leaves? Just edit them out of the
> template? The mentor procedure talks about adds (but does not mention
> the
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-au
What's the protocol when a committer leaves? Just edit them out of the
template? The mentor procedure talks about adds (but does not mention
the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template)
but does not mention deletes.
-
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 10:08, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>> Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
>> (thrift, sis, and esme).
>
> They all have Joe as a mentor and it is Joe who wants to drive this
> experiment. He feels th
On 23/08/2010 10:08, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
(thrift, sis, and esme).
They all have Joe as a mentor and it is Joe who wants to drive this
experiment. He feels that this will benefit those particular projects.
Ross
D.
On Mo
Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
(thrift, sis, and esme).
D.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> The vote has closed and here is the tally:...
>
> I was offline and missed the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The vote has closed and here is the tally:...
I was offline and missed the vote but here's my late +1 for support!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@
Hi
A little more than a week ago I posted the proposal concerning the
incubation of ALOIS. Unfortunatly there wasn't much of a discussion so
far. Furthermore, we are still looking for mentors. Any feedback is
welcome!
Best
Urs
P.S.: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AloisProposal.
Am Samstag,
23 matches
Mail list logo
