Hi Everyone,
First off I would like to thank everyone for voting on NPanday to be in the
incubator.
We already have our mailing lists setup @
* for NPanday usage questions; npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org
(subscribe by posting to npanday-users-subscr...@incubator.apache.org)
* for
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.
On 2010-08-19, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
>> remove the current rule that
Ross Gardler wrote:
> For me success or failure comes down to the quality of the mentoring and
> the willingness of the project committers to learn how to apply the
> Apache Way to their community.
+1
--- Noel
-
To u
Greg Stein wrote:
> The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
> is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
> with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
> to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board, as no r
+1
Dan
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 7:11:39 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Joe Sch
Hi David,
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/18/10 5:50 PM, "David Crossley" wrote:
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Actually, speaking of which too, Noel, since I'm on the Incubator PMC, please
> add me as a mentor for SIS now too. I'll add myself as a mentor to the SIS
> proposal on the wiki as
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Actually, speaking of which too, Noel, since I'm on the Incubator PMC, please
> add me as a mentor for SIS now too. I'll add myself as a mentor to the SIS
> proposal on the wiki as well, but can someone please add me to the other
> appropriate areas (or tell me
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:12 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to
> PPMC
>
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> ob
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1, happy experimenting!
--tim
-
Hi Joe,
+1 from me. Thanks for sticking with this.
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/18/10 4:11 PM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Messag
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 20:06, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> How does naming accomplish the goal of collaborative, consensus-based
>> development? I thought that was why we were here. I hadn't heard that
>
> We force Java code to be package cha
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> How does naming accomplish the goal of collaborative, consensus-based
> development? I thought that was why we were here. I hadn't heard that
>
We force Java code to be package changed to be org.apache.*. Why do we do
that? That's a SERIOUS
+1
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 13:44, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I have come to the realization that I'm not
> going to convince Noel to see things my way
> any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
> formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules
> for the 3 aforementioned projects.
>
> Specifically,
To further expand on this comment:
The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board
+1
Niall
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/10 23:11, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
I know I've been quite here, but I've been
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> F
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:08 PM
> Subject:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:02, Sanjiva Weerawarana
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> > When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
>>> > that the board is expected to follow t
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:02, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> > When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
>> > that the board is expected to follow the terminology used by only one
>> > project. Really? The boa
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
> > that the board is expected to follow the terminology used by only one
> > project. Really? The board, which has used the same terms for 10++
> > years, is now goi
Thanks so much Niall for both the vote and the svn commit!
Les
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> Fixed both issues Sebb raised. I doubt either was an impediment to
>> graduation, but keep 'em coming. Oh and the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Fixed both issues Sebb raised. I doubt either was an impediment to
> graduation, but keep 'em coming. Oh and the votes too! (I fear our
> little vote will get lost in experiment/radical chat).
I just published the changes(ran the ant script
On 18 Aug 2010, at 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
> My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
> add it to NOTICES.
Indeed. We have precedent on bundling of third-party code,
such as expat and pcre.
--
Nick Kew
--
+1 Yay!
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
> project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
> to present the project resolution to the board. The community
> graduation vot
Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it?
Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are already "generic", so
we shouldn't really need to change much in terms of branding other than the
primary website.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Bruno Harbulot
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/08/2010 14:23, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
>>> add it to N
Hi,
On 18/08/2010 14:23, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
Sure, but what about the licence headers?
I think I've seen this done in a few projects (I think one of them was
On 18/08/2010 14:25, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
questio
[ X ] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache Shiro as a TLP
Congrats to everyone. (the remaining issues that are being improperly
discussed on this VOTE thread are minor and not a blocker, IMO)
Dan
On Monday 16 August 2010 2:18:22 pm Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> The Apache Shiro community and the
I'm sure I read the rules for this on some ASF web page only a week or
so ago ...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
>> add it to NOTICES.
>
> Sure, but wha
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
question.
The thread implies it comes down to the
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
Sure, but what about the licence headers?
Ross
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advic
The vote passes with the following four binding +1 IPMC votes :
Donald Woods, Kevan Miller, Ant Elder, Mark Struberg
and the following four non-binding PPMC +1 votes:
Carlos Vara, Simone Tripodi, Gerhard Petracek, Jeremy Bauer
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 8/13/10 1:38 PM
BSD license as in "with advertising clause" or as in "new BSD license
without advertising clause? IANAL, but my impression is that the reply
depends on that.
Jochen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
> si
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
> situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a simple case
> so
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a simple
case so I'm asking the IPMC rather than legal-discuss@
In short:
- there is a few files that are part of an existing FOAF+SSL
certification project (BSD
Looks good to me too, i can't see anything at all to comment on.
+1
...ant
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> +1
>
> Signature/checksums, build, source (RAT), and general snooping around with
> emacs all looked good. Thanks Donald!
>
> --kevan
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:38
Hi Gav,
You've done a heck of a lot more than sort out license headers! In particular
when we first entered the incubator there were so many things you did to help
us get our act together.
So thanks for all your help and input as a Wookie mentor, I really appreciate
all that you've done for us
40 matches
Mail list logo
