Hi
> IANAL either. At Apache we encourage the use of dependencies that are
> licensed with an Apache-compatible license but we are not strict about
> it. We have projects with dependencies on such things as Microsoft
> Windows. We have had projects with hard dependencies on Java before
> J
On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the feedback.
If it's been GPL-licensed, you'll need the permission of all
contributors
to re-license it. Have you kept meticulous records of all
contributions
over the lifetime of the project so you can expect to be able to
Hi
> For me, the challenge during Incubation would revolve mostly around
> community. Perhaps it is exactly what Logging project needs to infuse
> more interest and activity, and that we will see folks from that
> background joining in... I don't think the current "weak" community is
> reason enou
Hi
Thanks for the feedback.
> If it's been GPL-licensed, you'll need the permission of all contributors
> to re-license it. Have you kept meticulous records of all contributions
> over the lifetime of the project so you can expect to be able to contact
> everyone?
Since the software has been de
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2010, at 09:31, Urs Lerch wrote:
>
>> GPL-licenced, implemented in
>> Ruby and completely based on other OSS-licensed components,
>
> If it's been GPL-licensed, you'll need the permission of all contributors
> to re-license it. Have
On 14 Aug 2010, at 09:31, Urs Lerch wrote:
> GPL-licenced, implemented in
> Ruby and completely based on other OSS-licensed components,
If it's been GPL-licensed, you'll need the permission of all contributors
to re-license it. Have you kept meticulous records of all contributions
over the li
