On 2/4/2010 11:24 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> In that case, +0 from me. We gain the elimination of the p.a.o bit but
> lose the benefit of the delay, so it's basically a wash, as far as I'm
> concerned.
After several years of watching incubator site commits, I don't see this
is a serious problem.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
>> need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
>> (Anakia). People will still need to run
+1 (slightly late, but I have a great excuse!)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
>> active
Hello,
We are now at the 4th February deadline for this vote.
We have:
+1 from Ant Elder
+1 from Mark Hindess
We still need two more +1s from the IPMC before the release can be made.
Some -1s from
the IPMC would be useful if we need to fix anything and roll another
release candidate
