On 1/19/10 7:17 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[x] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
-
To un
I'll echo Ant's & Matthieu's +1
they are ready.
On 1/19/10 8:00 PM, ant elder wrote:
I echo Matthieu's comments about Cassandra being ready to graduate,
I'll vote +1 for it in a vote. Not sure if that PMC list is actually
the complete list as I thought there was talk of adding others, i'll
ask a
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>> ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you
>>> want to reconsider your veto.
On 01/19/2010 01:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues.
Who would be able to make this call?
Does anyone else have an opinion? Please d
Let me be clear too, I'm not trying to mess with the vote in any way,
just wondering if my email account was going nuts, as I've seen a
couple of gmail hiccups in the last days and was over-sensitive... :)
2010/1/20 Gianugo Rabellino :
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala
> wrote:
>>> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
>>> express your disagreement with the majority?
>>
>> I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianug
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
>> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
>> express your disagreement with the majority?
>
> I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find
> it...
I just replied to the wrong email wh
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
>> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
>> express your disagreement with the majority?
>
> I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find
> it...
It's on esme-dev only, wasn't CCed h
Definitely a case of buggy gmail/our list software, it is not here...
I'm loosing more and more emails messages without any warning, and I'd
like to know if it is trouble in our infrastructure or in gmail.
Anybody knows?
Regards
Santiago
2010/1/20 Richard Hirsch :
> Check his email from Tue, Jan
Check his email from Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:06 PM
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
>> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
>> express your disagreement with the majority?
>
> I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't
> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
> express your disagreement with the majority?
I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find it...
Regards
Santiago
-
To unsubscr
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>> ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you
>> want to reconsider your veto
>
> As this vote is not about a technical issue, I don't think ther
12 matches
Mail list logo
