Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I > would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote: > For running the application we also use > hibernate. For Hibernate, try to convert the application to use the JPA API instead, then you can ship with OpenJPA from Apache and allow users to use Hibernate instead if they want. Cheers --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote: > Is a LGPL Library a general Issue? For running the application we also use > hibernate. > Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all > already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict? Fo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 On 29/10/2009, at 5:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. The proposal is included below and is also at: Please cast

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. The proposal is included below and is also at: Please cast y

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

+1. Like to join as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: Paul Querna To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, October 28, 2009 2:39:32 PM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I > would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

- Original Message > From: Paul Querna > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wed, October 28, 2009 2:39:32 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation > > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I > would like to start the vote to incuba

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > Please cast your votes: > > [X] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation > [ ] +0 Indifferent to Libcloud incubation > [ ] -1 Reject Libcloud for incubation > > Vote Closes 72 hours from now. Good luck! -- justin --

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 from me. On 10/28/2009 04:17 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: [X ] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation Looks cool, good luck! -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 Best of luck! Regards, Alan On Oct 28, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. The proposal is included below and is also at:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I > would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 Good luck with this. Craig On Oct 28, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. The proposal is included below and is also at:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

> [X ] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation Looks cool, good luck! -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

hi, openmeetings _can_ be distributed without red5. Red5 acts like Tomcat (actually it is a modified Tomcat). And openmeetings is a webapp inside this container. For easy usage and installation we distribute it as one package, but its still clear the its red5 + openmeetings. Is a LGPL Library a g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

+1 On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I > would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: The better thing is that Adobe finally opened RTMP specification [1]. The specification license prohibits unintended use of rtmp for for violating digital protection (this somehow relates to new GPL v.3 features) and intercepting video, othewise it is

[VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. The proposal is included below and is also at: Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation [

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

2009/10/28 Alexei Fedotov : > Hello Paul, > Thanks for a good question! > > Openmeetings is red5 application which is very close to ordinary web > application. AFAIU, the last change by Sebastian makes them even > closer by implementing ".war" deployment. The code of the projects > does not overlap

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On 28 Oct 2009, at 14:18, Sebastian Wagner wrote: hi, OpenLaszlo is used for compiling the Client. You don't need it to run the Application. So it is not needed to re-destribute OpenLaszlo. It is linked into the Application as Library, when you have compiled the code you can remove OpenL

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Hello Ian, Thanks for raising questions. As for OpenLaszlo, I cannot say much. Some Apache projects use Microsoft compiler, that's legal. I believe it is quite doable to build OpenLaszlo completely on Apache stack, but that project has their own authors. As for Red5, the situation is good and bec

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

hi, OpenLaszlo is used for compiling the Client. You don't need it to run the Application. So it is not needed to re-destribute OpenLaszlo. It is linked into the Application as Library, when you have compiled the code you can remove OpenLaszlo's Framework. Red5 does no transcoding. That is why it

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ian Boston wrote: > Also, are there any problems between Red5 and Adobe in terms of patents on > the Flash Media Server protocols. IIRC Adobe have some patents in this area > but I have no idea if they are relevant and enforceable or would want to > enforce them a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Openmeetings looks very interesting. I notice Red5, and see Paul Querna asked a question. I have 2 questions for my own education more than anything, What's the status of OpenLazlo wrt Apache Projects? I see it has a long list of dependencies with all sorts of licenses [1] but have no ide

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

Hi Paul... Allow me to dis-agree with ya :), cause this could be very beneficial to any IT Operations Admins. I used to work in IBM Egypt and you take a suitable time to make up an environment and make it operations or when you add new hardware and want it to be operational with other machines.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Hello Nick, There is a "Not a member" button [1] on the first page to get a free account. If you doesn't mind Russian field names during registration you can try [2] as a localization example. [1] http://www.openmeetings.de/ [2] http://www.telebridge.ru/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Nick Kew

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Hello Paul, Thanks for a good question! Openmeetings is red5 application which is very close to ordinary web application. AFAIU, the last change by Sebastian makes them even closer by implementing ".war" deployment. The code of the projects does not overlap in any way, and projects are connected v