Hail Podlings,
On the following overview page,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html, there a couple of
podlings that doesn't have any information what they are about. This
limits visibility to straying developers that are browsing around. So,
please provide a description.
Cassandra
Che
+1
Cheers,
Adam
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-)
Yes.
Did not realise at the time that using +1 there was ambiguous; sorry about that.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >>
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi;
This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.
OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
which is defined as JSR-299.
OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
There is one *bin
Sebb,
To my surprise...
How come you are not on the PMC? You have contributed more oversight the
last year than then rest of the PMC aggregated. You just need to ask, all
Members can join...
-- Niclas
I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> Thomas Fischer (mentor)
>> Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
>> Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
>> You (IPMC)
>
> If you look back, I did not actually reg
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Thomas Fischer (mentor)
> Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
> Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
> You (IPMC)
If you look back, I did not actually register a +1 vote, and anyway I
am not on the IPMC.
The other three are on the IPMC, and did register votes.
>
>
Thomas Fischer (mentor)
Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
You (IPMC)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
>>
>> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>>
>>
>> +1 votes:
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
>
> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
>
> +1 votes: 4 binding
> 0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 0
Who voted?
I can only count 3 +1 votes.
> Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incub
Finally. +10. Good job guys.
2009/9/21 Eric Evans :
>
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distribute
Congrats!
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
> +1 votes: 4 binding
> 0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 0
>
> Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incubating rele
The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
+1 votes: 4 binding
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incubating release.
Thanks,
The apache empire-db team.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/
yep or no default url and a url in the CI profile. Will take care of that
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
>>
>> Can't one provide the URL as a c
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
>
> Can't one provide the URL as a command-line parameter?
> In which case, just drop it from the POM (maybe replace with comment
> to show an example command-line)
Perhaps
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
> url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues?
Issues, but non-blocking.
> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
Can't one provi
I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues?
On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
On the manifest date I agree it would be nice to have them equal but
if we have to make the rele
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> ...I don't think this should
> block a podling release, nor a TLP release
Ok, +1 to the release then, provided the issues raised in this thread
are fixed next time.
-Bertrand
---
FWIW, the web site is already up and availabe at:
http://incubator.apache.org/aries/
Though there's nothing there yet.
Mailing lists are not created yet, but I'' update the site as soon as they are.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 20:42, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi Alan...
>
> Thanks a lot for yo
Hi Mohammad,
Great.. Will do
Thanks,
Alan
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alan...
>
> Thanks a lot for you desire to contribute :). You should follow the
> progress of Aries incubation on this list and Aries should have a site
> which
IMO this is a non-issue. For a release, sites must be distributed to
some location on p.a.o before the site can be distributed. This
particular thing is only in:
people.apache.org.site
Empire-db Maven Site
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Can we get another +1 or -1 vote? This release is a long time in the
> making and AIUI, only very minor issues are left...
Sebb hasn't replied to Rainer about
scp://people.apache.org/home/francisdb/public_html/empire-db/site
yet, I'd wai
Can we get another +1 or -1 vote? This release is a long time in the
making and AIUI, only very minor issues are left...
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>>
23 matches
Mail list logo