[VOTE] Approve the release of PDFBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-09-17 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi, The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of PDFBox. The release candidate is available for review at http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/pdfbox-0.8.0-incubating/ See the attached original vote messages for more details. Please vote to approve this release. This I

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread David Crossley
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: > Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is > defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. (This issue is not a release blocker.) The phrase "ASL-lic

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes >>>don't "carry over" (well mine never does) IMO. Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, Septemb

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi Sebb, >>>The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree >>>contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. >>>This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in >>>NOTICE or LICENSE. >>>IMO this is a blocker. I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facel

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb
On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and > Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is > defined as JSR

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > The Pivot community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache > Pivot 1.3 Release Candidate 3. We would now like to request the permission > of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page. > [...] >

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb
On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > Hi; > > > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts >

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and > Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > +1 (binding) > >      Thomas > >> [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) >> >> Here we go again :-) >> >> Hi, >> >> We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). >> Our community approve

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Fischer
+1 (binding) Thomas > [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) > > Here we go again :-) > > Hi, > > We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). > Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding > voting round for IPMC Members/Mento

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-17 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jeremy Hughes wrote: 2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski : On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: ... IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is decided. There are many possible outcomes fr

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-17 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > After mu

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Todd Volkert
> Where are your mentors? > Niclas voted +1. Martijn is presumably dealing with his 2-month-old ;-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > Voting has expired, and we're two votes shy of the 3 required.  Can someone > please take a look? -- it should be pretty quick, as the issues brought up > in the rc2 candidate have all been resolved. Where are your mentors? I'll give th

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Todd Volkert
Voting has expired, and we're two votes shy of the 3 required. Can someone please take a look? -- it should be pretty quick, as the issues brought up in the rc2 candidate have all been resolved. Thanks! -T On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Todd Volkert wrote: > I've received feedback form Nicla

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M1-incubating (RC4a)

2009-09-17 Thread Angela Cymbalak
+1 (non-binding, I believe) Angie At 02:46 AM 9/17/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone > release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish th

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO >>>impatience isn't a good enough reason. Yes, my fault. >>>Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a >>>blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he >>>agreed with you. Giving a

[VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: >> Hi Niall; >> >The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >etiquett

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Niall; > The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vo

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: >> Hi Niall; >> >The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >etiquett

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Niall; > The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vo