I remember when the policy regarding @author tags was set several
years ago. Plenty of projects were using them to identify developers.
Is this documented anywhere? All I could find was a number of
discussions referencing such a decision, but I could not find an
actual document which state
- Original Message
> From: Ralph Goers
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > - Original Message
> >
> >> From: Ralph Goers
> >>
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ralph Goers
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:00:00 PM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
So I found it: http://www
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> - Original Message
>
- Original Message
> From: Ralph Goers
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:00:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> > So I found it: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
>
On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
So I found it: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Please take a look at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
[1]
If this document is not normative, please let me know. Granted, it
says "sho
On 19/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:11 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Ant,
> > > >
> > > > I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially
On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:11 PM, sebb wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Ant,
I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially policy.
After having been through the fine points of LICENSE vs. NOTICE so
many
times, I thou
So I found it: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Please take a look at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
[1]
If this document is not normative, please let me know. Granted, it
says "should" and not "must", so if there is a discussion presum
On 18/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Ant,
> >
> > I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially policy.
> >
> > After having been through the fine points of LICENSE vs. NOTICE so many
> times, I thought the consensus was t
On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Ant,
I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially policy.
After having been through the fine points of LICENSE vs. NOTICE so
many times, I thought the consensus was to put *all* licenses into
the top level LICENSE file. Bu
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> Incubator PMC for this release.
>>
>> Cassandra is a massively sc
In order to bring the text of
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
in line with the text of
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
I would like to eliminate most of the usages of the word "distribution"
in releasemanagement.xml and replace it with the word "package". I fin
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> - Original Message
>
Hi Ant,
I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially policy.
After having been through the fine points of LICENSE vs. NOTICE so
many times, I thought the consensus was to put *all* licenses into the
top level LICENSE file. But having just scoured the official public
pages promul
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
>
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:56 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt in its META-INF dir.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-566
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
>> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Rel
Works for me, but to get my +1 I need to see
libthrift.jar sorted out.
- Original Message
> From: Eric Evans
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:55:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 a
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> - Original Message
>
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:58 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory
> in the LICENSE file.
Does the patch attached to CASSANDRA-371[0] suffice?
[0]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12416885/v1-0001-CASSANDRA-371-top-leve
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:19:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
>
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > For the recent LICENSE and NOTICE file issues the c
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> For the recent LICENSE and NOTICE file issues the current policy
>> allows for the different approaches, different TLPs use different
>> approaches, there's not been consensus on
Hi Ant,
On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
For the recent LICENSE and NOTICE file issues the current policy
allows for the different approaches, different TLPs use different
approaches, there's not been consensus on a single approach, and there
are relevant JIRAs open with legal that
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:53:25 AM
> Subject: Making up policy on the fly
>
> For a while now on general@ we've had people come along during a
> poddling release votes and raise issues about things that ar
For a while now on general@ we've had people come along during a
poddling release votes and raise issues about things that aren't
backed up by clear ASF policy or reasonably obvious consensus in
behaviour of existing TLPs. Often poddlings just buckle and do a
respin as thats easier than debating th
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> >>
>> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder,
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > On 18
On 18/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
>
> I wish to raise an objectio
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
I was surprised to read this,
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>
> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> * 0 votes: 0
> * -1 votes: 0
>
> The vote passes.
I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
in the binary re
32 matches
Mail list logo
