Re: [DOCUMENTATION ERROR] Documenting sponsorship by another PMC

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > ant elder wrote: > >> See: > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Approval+of+Pr > oposal+by+Sponsor > > There is an uncorrected defect in that process document. It says, in part, > that the sponsoring PMC must provide

Incubator Board Report June 2009

This past month has been a normally good month for the Incubator. There is a project, Traffic Server, that appears to be of interest to the HTTPd crowd. Another project, VXQuery, is in the process of being sponsored by the XMLBeans PMC. The Incubator is pleased to see that log4php has gained new

Missed reports: SocialSite and Wink

SocialSite should have reported this month. Please report each month for the next three months. Wink is brand new, but is still required to report, even on status getting setup. Please report each month for the next three months. --- Noel -

RE: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

I am +1 to start Incubation, but not pleased to see only one Mentor on your list. I see that this project is going to come to us formally from the XMLBeans PMC. I would expect a better (more complete) Mentor list when they resubmit. And I would hope to see community growth, including other parti

[DOCUMENTATION ERROR] Documenting sponsorship by another PMC

ant elder wrote: > See: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Approval+of+Pr oposal+by+Sponsor There is an uncorrected defect in that process document. It says, in part, that the sponsoring PMC must provide the Incubator PMC with: * a reference to the results of the vot

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

Hi Ant, We had a discussion earlier at XMLBeans about sponsoring VXQuery, but there wasn't an official vote. I didn't know this route was available, I thought the Incubator PMC has to approve it. So, we'll take it on the XMLBeans with an official vote. Cezar Andrei XMLBeans PMC Chair On Mon, Jun

Re: Bypassing Incubator

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Gavin wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com] >> Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 2:15 PM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Bypassing Incubator >> >> Tim Ellison wrote: >> > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> >

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Roy T. Fielding wrote: I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince some of the former coders to join in the proposal? This is definitely a valid concern. We

RE: Bypassing Incubator

> -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com] > Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 2:15 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Bypassing Incubator > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > 1. Any substantial codebase needs at least IP Clearance

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache VXQuery, > a Java based XQuery processor, for a vote > > The full proposal can be found at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal > > Thanks, > Vina

Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:28 +0100, Ian Boston wrote: > Hi, > This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received > the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There > has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. > The vote on shindig

Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

i think everyone has a limited amount of time available and will focus their energy where they think it matters. For me, that means that I try to help 'my podlings' to the best of my abilities and only get involved in others when I have 'nothing better to do'. Your primary source of support are the

Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston wrote: > ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on > this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing > another release and wasting the IPMC's time... I can't speak for others, but for me it's be

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

Hello, Please find the proposal inline. Thanks, Vinayak VXQueryProposal Abstract Apache VXQuery is a language processor that implements the XML Query Language v1.0 standardized by the W3C. Proposal VXQuery (Versatile XQuery) will be a standards compliant XML Query processor implemented i

Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28, Ian Boston wrote: > Hi, > This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the > necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1 > +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on > shindig-dev resul

[VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

Hi, This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's Votes so

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache VXQuery, > a Java based XQuery processor, for a vote > > The full proposal can be found at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal Please provide t