Hi Phil,
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The last item before graduation is activity and diversity, which
are lacking. There were a few developers during the project but now
we have only one active developer. And it's not clear that we will
be able any time soon to attract
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
The Sanselan podling [1] has been incubating since 2007 and has
achieved most of the goals in incubation:
Code has been released [2] according to the incubator release guidelines
Status is up to date [3]
Community mailing lists are responded to promptly [5]
JIRA iss
Hi Bertrand,
On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen
wrote:
...Voting a new PPMC member guide at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+PPMC+member
says
that new PPMC members should be added to
https://s
Hi, Craig,
I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for
Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics
(despite the name, this is not only about XML) a better place.
Nevertheless, I'd vote in favour of Sanselan, if it comes to that.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at
Hi,
i am not on the Commons PMC, i can only speak for myself.
> 1. It appears that d...@commons is the general mailing list for all commons
> projects. Would a small project like sanselan get lost in the traffic?
I don't think so - there are several other small components on
commons. It looks li
Hi Janne,
On Apr 18, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
I don't remember adding PPMC members to such a file in the podlings
that I've been mentoring - my guess would be that we just stopped
maintaining that file.
Can anyone confirm?
AFAICT we udpdate the poddling status page with the
On Apr 18, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Janne,
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
I don't remember adding PPMC members to such a file in the podlings
that I've been mentoring - my guess would be that we just stopped
maintaining that file.
Can anyone confirm?
AFAICT we udpdate the p
On Apr 18, 2009, at 9:16 AM, sebb wrote:
Is there a standard way to identify the initial import of a codebase
in SVN?
No, there's a suggestion at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html
to create a separate part of the repository to import the code base:
...Particular care needs t
Is there a standard way to identify the initial import of a codebase in SVN?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Janne,
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
>
>>> I don't remember adding PPMC members to such a file in the podlings
>>> that I've been mentoring - my guess would be that we just stopped
>>> maintaining that file.
>>>
>>> Can anyone confirm?
>>
>> AFAICT we udpdate the poddling status page with the PPMC m
I don't remember adding PPMC members to such a file in the podlings
that I've been mentoring - my guess would be that we just stopped
maintaining that file.
Can anyone confirm?
AFAICT we udpdate the poddling status page with the PPMC members.
Should I file a JIRA issue to get it fixed from
Hi,
Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen
> wrote:
>> ...Voting a new PPMC member guide at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+PPMC+member says
>> that new PPMC members should be added to
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen
wrote:
> ...Voting a new PPMC member guide at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+PPMC+member says
> that new PPMC members should be added to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/incubator-info.txt.
> Ho
13 matches
Mail list logo
