> My view, and I believe Torstens view is that to become a committer means
to
> join the dev lists, send in patches, be part of the community, gain trust
> with the project members and then after a while be voted in as a
committer.
Trust related to what? Keep in mind that Committer != PMC member,
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > The Commons Incubator would act as a "perpetual podling" or
> > "mini-Incubator" overseeing the influx of components to be
> > adopted into Apache Commons.
> -1 (vote, not veto).
-1 from me, at least for now, for the same reasons:
> If Commons
Todd,
> can one more PMC member please make sure the release looks ok?
Please reply to Luciano's comments.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ge
> Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
That's code. What about community, Torsten? What is the Community? It has
been the Apache Commons as a collective, not sub-projects. Is that to
change? We do not want Apache Commons to turn into an umbrella, right? We
need to keep
> > Now, the only thing missing for it to be perfect, in my book,
> > is that it doesn't use maven to build... :)
> I'm not a maven expert. There's a pom that currently does not work
Par for the course. ;-) As long as it builds with Ant, people should be
happy.
--- Noel (reknowned Maven
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Pivot 1.1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and with the endorsement of our mentors, we would now like to
> request the permission of the I
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> You're insinuating too much here. Simply put the commons PMC would
>> want to see committers in action before making them full blown Commons
>> committers. This is no different
El dom, 12-04-2009 a las 12:35 +0800, Niclas Hedhman escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > You're insinuating too much here. Simply put the commons PMC would
> > want to see committers in action before making them full blown Commons
> > committers. This is no
El sáb, 11-04-2009 a las 19:56 +1000, Gavin escribió:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: tcu...@vafer.org [mailto:tcu...@vafer.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
> > Curdt
> > Sent: Saturday, 11 April 2009 7:26 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
>
El sáb, 11-04-2009 a las 20:35 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Aidan Skinner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> (Apache and RMS s
El sáb, 11-04-2009 a las 11:28 +0200, Torsten Curdt escribió:
> > I think this is a self-imposed constraint.
>
> Indeed it is.
>
> > Many other projects have no
> > problem bringing in 'bulk' via IP Clearance and taking in one or two
> > committers with it.
>
> Well, some do :) That's why now th
11 matches
Mail list logo
