On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> You're insinuating too much here. Simply put the commons PMC would
> want to see committers in action before making them full blown Commons
> committers. This is no different from any of the other incubations
> that then graduate into an e
Incubator PMC Members; Please take a look at the Apache Pivot release
candidate, so this very very active and healthy community can get on
with it.
Thanks
Niclas
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Piv
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
>>
>> Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
>> They want to bring this code to Commons. What
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 21:24, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Gavin wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: tcu...@vafer.org [mailto:tcu...@vafer.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
>
>
>
>>> The incubator approach just doesn't work well for projects that have a
>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Chris Chabot wrote:
>>>
>>> Ps, Hans De Goede has a bit more experience with several distro's then me
>>> and offered to help out too, i've adde
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner
>> wrote:
>
>> (Apache and RMS saw Java a little differently: an opportunity as
>> opposed to a trap. Apache has always b
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Gavin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tcu...@vafer.org [mailto:tcu...@vafer.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
>> The incubator approach just doesn't work well for projects that have a
>> very small scope and user base IMO.
+1
the smaller the code base,
--- On Sat, 4/11/09, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> From: Torsten Curdt
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 5:44 AM
> > My view, and I believe Torstens
> view is that to become a committer means to
> > join the dev lists, sen
> My view, and I believe Torstens view is that to become a committer means to
> join the dev lists, send in patches, be part of the community, gain trust
> with the project members and then after a while be voted in as a committer.
> Now if someone has a nice great big chunk of code, or even a whol
> -Original Message-
> From: tcu...@vafer.org [mailto:tcu...@vafer.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
> Curdt
> Sent: Saturday, 11 April 2009 7:26 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:22, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Fri
> I think this is a self-imposed constraint.
Indeed it is.
> Many other projects have no
> problem bringing in 'bulk' via IP Clearance and taking in one or two
> committers with it.
Well, some do :) That's why now there is the proposal I guess ;)
cheers
--
Torsten
-
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:22, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
>>
>> Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
>> They want to bring this code to Commons. What to
Hi All,
This is a heads-up that Buildbot CI server is now available for projects
use.
Some projects that have been used for testing Buildbot here at the ASF can
be seen at http://ci.apache.org.
I have a development installation at
http://build01.16degrees.com.au:8020/waterfall where I have b
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> The current state of affairs makes it highly impractical for any codebase
> that includes IP from a non-ASF-committer to enter Apache Commons.
I think this is a self-imposed constraint. Many other projects have no
problem bringing in 'bulk'
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
>
> Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
> They want to bring this code to Commons. What to do? IP clearance is
> one thing. But what about the 2 devel
15 matches
Mail list logo
