>> as allready said, I tried to get contact to Log4PHP. The only one who
>> responded is one of the mentors. But besides that, some other people
>> mailed me (directly, unfortunatly) and claimed that they tried to
>> commit patches, but never get heard by any developer.
>
>> Unfortunatly I am not a
Dear all,
I would like to start an incubator project at the Apache Software Foundation
with a Java library (let's call it Jaffre) I've written.
Jaffre is a lightweight RPC library for the Java platform.
It is designed to be simple, extensible, robust, and efficient with
no required dependencies
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > = Log4php =
> > Log4php failed to report.
> > Log4php has been in the Incubator since 2004, and was retired once already,
> > then reviewed by new interest appeared. Reviewing the mailing list, Log4php
> > appears to still be very much a one person project, with Chr
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
> El lun, 16-03-2009 a las 12:58 -0400, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> > Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent.
> > Cassandra, I note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to
> > provide one.
> >
>
> shindig discusse
I am away on vacation and not really well connected. Could someone
else write add/complete my lines to the incubator report? Brian? Ian?
But to sum it up: Cassandra had a very(!) slow start. First code just
got in a couple of days ago. Hardly any traffic on the lists yet. (a
little concerne
El lun, 16-03-2009 a las 12:58 -0400, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent.
> Cassandra, I note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to
> provide one.
>
shindig discussed it too, and failed to report too
> Mentors should please review
Hi,
> = Log4php =
> Log4php failed to report.
> Log4php has been in the Incubator since 2004, and was retired once already,
> then reviewed by new interest appeared. Reviewing the mailing list, Log4php
> appears to still be very much a one person project, with Christian Grobmeier
> as the sole pa
After last month's report, the Incubator has started the process of
recognizing the dormant status of projects that are in that condition.
The most serious issue that happened this past month is recorded in the
Empire-DB report, the gist of which is that a Committer had provided a
third-party with
Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent. Cassandra, I
note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to provide one.
Mentors should please review these projects, and comment on what actions they
feel are appropriate.
--- Noel
--
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a staging repository for 0.6, which you can view on
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-4fdaf205188c41/
i'd like to download everything so i can run rat in recursive mode
is there an easy
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:54 PM, James Dixson wrote:
>> Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
>> apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
+1
Cheers
Niclas
--
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
---
+1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:54 PM, James Dixson wrote:
> Here are new package versions for apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating. A
> DISCLAIMER.txt is now included...
>
> From the original vote request...
>
>> Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
>> apache
Hi,
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2009, those board
reports are missing - I assume adding them Real Soon Now is still
possible.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
