On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Attached is the graduation resolution, Please consider your vote for our
> graduation...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
> seems be on December.
I just removed;
* Hama (June - Aug)
from the "Monthly" section.
Mentors: You need to get better at this!
Cheers
Niclas
---
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:20 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clutch gets some information from
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
> and some more from
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
>
> Then it gets hints from each project's status page
> regard
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Depends on what "take it out of the incubator" means:
> - graduation to TLP
> - graduation to sub project
> - stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
>
> Graduation is covered in the graduation guide [1], stopping (aka
> failing) is not covered in a
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
>
> [1]
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbd
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Jason Van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
>
> We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
> members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
>
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> >> Craig L Russell wrote:
> >> >
> >> > There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
> >> > order of graduation votes wrong.
> >>
> >> Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtask
Depends on what "take it out of the incubator" means:
- graduation to TLP
- graduation to sub project
- stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
Graduation is covered in the graduation guide [1], stopping (aka
failing) is not covered in a guide (yet). I assume a formal vote on
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
incubator.
Is there any official process or do we just update the documentation?
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
incubator.
Is there any official process or do we just update the documentation?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:43 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>> >
>> > There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
>> > order of graduation votes wrong.
>>
>> Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task templat
On Nov 8, 2008, at 15:17 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your
support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I am now calling a vote:
[ ] Yes, CouchDB is ready to become a top la
+1 binding
Dan
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 3:51:31 pm Carl Trieloff wrote:
> It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev
> list that Qpid
> would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC
> felt that the
> Qpid project should increase its divers
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
>
> The STATUS template says;
>
>
> Ask infrastructure to create source repository modules and grant the
> committers karma.
>
>
> But I have also been told on lists that the PMC Chair is responsible
> for Authorization.
>
> So what is it?
Missing punctuation, p
Good job on the community work !!!
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work together
> and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate.
>
> +1
>
> Craig
>
> On Nov 12,
Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work
together and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate.
+1
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our
dev list that Qpid
would like t
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
> >
> > There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
> > order of graduation votes wrong.
>
> Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
> pre-populate) instead. So much more accessible, flexible and ac
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My +1 (mentor/IPMC)
I never know if we need to vote again ;) My +1 as well, with both
mentor and IPMC hats.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
My +1 (mentor/IPMC)
Paul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
>> that Qpid
>> would lik
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
> that Qpid
> would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
> that the
> Qpid project should increase
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev
list that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC
felt that the
Qpid project should increase its diversity. Over the intervening months
Qpid has
added more independents to the project & PPM
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
>> order of graduation votes wrong.
>
> Ok. My vote is still to have a
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbdf47dc06f1dbb0fd2b00e109b86
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> Nope, JSecurity reported from July to O
Thanks for the help, Craig. I was able to commit the updates and the website
appears to have synced as well.
- Michael
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:28 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: any Incubator com
+1
-Original Message-
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:22 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Stonehenge
Bertrand
Great feedback. I think we should keep a clear statement in the SVN
and distros that identifies w
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
The info has been updated since then.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month
> schedule.
>
> This reminder was generated from out-of-date info
which is a good trigger for updating said info ;-)
-Bertrand
--
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Novem
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 9:05:55 am Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I cross-checked all the votes with this file:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt
> (r15883)
>
> And did not see Daniel Kulp's name listed under the Incubator PMC. Did I
> miss some
Hi Paul,
I cross-checked all the votes with this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt
(r15883)
And did not see Daniel Kulp's name listed under the Incubator PMC. Did I
miss something?
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi All
As per the IP Clearance template, POI has received a software grant for
OpenXML4J, and we'd like to get the OK for this. The template in svn is
filled out as openxml4j.xml, and the source bundle is available from
http://people.apache.org/~nick/OpenXML4J-Grant/ . An appropriate software
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under "monthly" at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
> the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under "monthly" at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, but you're righ
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm..
Bertrand
Great feedback. I think we should keep a clear statement in the SVN
and distros that identifies which parts of the project use which
dependencies. I also think we should structure the build so that each
different framework implementation of each application is a separate
build target. We
35 matches
Mail list logo
