On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible that empire-db is listed wrong for reporting this month?
Looks like it. I moved it to the Oct/Jan/Apr/Jul group.
Cheers
Niclas
-
To un
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The community and developers of Apache CouchDB deem
> the project ready for graduation to a top level Apache project.
Go for it...
Cheers
Niclas
-
To un
Deepal, that's cart before the horse .. this project needs to get to
graduation first :).
Serge, are you asking for the WS PMC to sponsor this project for incubation?
If so, how does this relate to the WS-Notification impl we already have on
top of Axis2? (Muse?) Having one by no means does no
I think we can keep this as the same level as Sandesha and Ramparrt. I
mean we do not have any modules other than core stuff under Axis2.
Deepal
> Serge,
>
> Unfortunately i won't be able to help much at this time due to time
> pressures. Hopefully one of my fellow PMC members may be interested i
Serge,
Unfortunately i won't be able to help much at this time due to time
pressures. Hopefully one of my fellow PMC members may be interested in
moving this forward. Best Wishes.
thanks,
dims
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Mankovskii, Serge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Davanum,
>
>
>
> In o
Hi Davanum,
In our search for a Champion and Sponsor for the Poloka proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PolokaProposal We looked into the
Savan, ServiceMix, Axis2, and MUSE projects.
We find that it makes most sense, so far, to have Poloka as a project
under Axis2. It also makes sens
Is it possible that empire-db is listed wrong for reporting this month?
Martijn
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:48 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
>>
>> There is one other project that is recently accepted:
>> Ope
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upon thinking about it, and talking with others, I really believe
> that Stonehenge had the potential of being an extremely cool
> effort. Not only for the code aspects, but even more importantly
> the impact it could have
Hi Paul,
Seems that this would become the most happening WS project @ Apache in the
future.
+1,
I'm interested.
Regards,
Senaka
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI
>
> Please jump in on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you are interested in this
> proposal.
>
>
> Its not and five active people is certainly viable, but my point
> really was for the long term viability in case people leave the
> project.
>
There are plenty of active Apache projects with less than 5 active
people, and there are other PMCs that are now inactive.
I don't think its necessary f
10 matches
Mail list logo
