+1 (as a mentor)
Ciao
Henning
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:33 -0700, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation.
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635274#action_12635274
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-87:
According to the pdf in documents/iclas/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634013#action_12634013
]
niclas edited comment on INCUBATOR-87 at 9/28/08 6:41 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635272#action_12635272
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on INCUBATOR-87:
-
I had the incorrect name (Barazza) ins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635271#action_12635271
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on INCUBATOR-87:
-
I am investigating why Rene's ICLA has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634013#action_12634013
]
niclas edited comment on INCUBATOR-87 at 9/28/08 6:36 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman closed INCUBATOR-84.
---
> Create Etch project status page.
>
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman closed INCUBATOR-89.
---
> Update Incubator Navigation to include Etch podling
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman resolved INCUBATOR-89.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Update Incubator Navigation to include Etch podling
> -
Add project to /projects/index.html
---
Key: INCUBATOR-94
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-94
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
Etch needs to ad
David Crossley wrote:
>
> Today i wanted a list of all projects that are
> currently in incubation. However that is not easy.
>
> The two main places are:
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
>
> However some podlings are missing fro
David Crossley wrote:
>
[snip]
> It seems that the process to get new projects started
> needs to be improved.
>
> The current list of things to do is at:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#bootstrap
>
> I suggest to move item 7 "Add podling to reporting schedule"
> up to the top o
Hi Janne,
I will be traveling to Helsinki within the next 6 months (probably).
If you're on tripit you can watch for my trip (in case I forget for
some reason to let you know).
Craig
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hac
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> That person would already have seen the incubating web site, the
>> release notes and most likely also the README, all of which come with
>>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >> If that's the case, then what's the point of having
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> If that's the case, then what's the point of having a separate repository?
>
> That the project B would have to, as much as possible, conscie
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >> Why should things be more complex for the users of p
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Why should things be more complex for the users of project B?
>
> It wouldn't. Project B would have the incubator repository included in its
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Since disclaimers are not part of the Apache License, they are no
> > obligated to. All we are trying to do here is to not let our
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll repeat again. The solution currently imposed is not ideal. It's
> not working. Problem is there is no other way.
Thanks for the patience! :-)
I'm not that interested in the technical issues. I just don't
unde
Jukka,
I'll repeat again. The solution currently imposed is not ideal. It's
not working. Problem is there is no other way.
For example, If the releases were signed and maven had a way for folks
to add say a gpg key before they could use artifacts from a repo, we
could put up a web page for the gp
Looks like we need a place to show case the people who don't get the
apache way. namely the folks who voted -1
-1 Ant Elder
-1 Craig Russell
-1 Emmanuel Lecharny
-1 Henning Schmiedehausen
-1 Jim Jagielski
-1 Justin Erenkrantz
-1 Kevan Miller
-1 Matt Hogstrom
-1 Matthieu
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did the VOTE and everyone has stated their opinions. Why bring it
> up again and again?
I'm keeping this alive to better understand and perhaps somehow
address the concerns of the people who opposed the change.
On 28-Sep-08, at 7:33 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
You mean the "Maven Way or the high way".
I think Bill is referring to the ASL Way.
We did the VOTE and everyone has stated their opinions. Why bring it
up again and again?
-- dims
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EM
On 27-Sep-08, at 9:05 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Unfortunately a typical response from you. Guess there's no point in
even trying..
Where the line of reasoning is unsound and shows a cavalier disregard
for users there would be no point.
I am a practical person above all else, and I liste
You mean the "Maven Way or the high way".
We did the VOTE and everyone has stated their opinions. Why bring it
up again and again?
-- dims
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Fine...Please state your *specific* use case sc
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:12 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Fine...Please state your *specific* use case scenario that is
>> problematic right now
>
> The problem set is that this thread now exceeds 500 posts in four
> years, with only one technical
27 matches
Mail list logo
