Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be > in the vote thread. > Here is the text of the proposal: > > == Abstract == > > Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-indepe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Poloka

2008-08-26 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Hello Roland, Thanks for taking the time to go through the proposal. I have had the opportunity to work on PADRES project with Prof Arno and his team as part of a project course this summer (which ended a few weeks ago). My impression is that the current students have a good understanding of how o

Re: [DISCUSS] Web20Kit: A Web 2.0 technology evaluation kit

2008-08-26 Thread Martin Cooper
Yeah, an association with WebKit was my first assumption as well. My greater concern, though, is purporting to compare technologies using one application with a very specific purpose. Certain technologies may shine in one application scenario and suck in others, while other technologies may show q

Re: [DISCUSS] Web20Kit: A Web 2.0 technology evaluation kit

2008-08-26 Thread Brett Porter
Without too much thought into the rest of it just now, the first thing I thought was that this would have something to do with WebKit, which it doesn't and would probably be very confusing? - Brett 2008/8/27 Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is a proposal to incubate > http://wiki.apach

[DISCUSS] Web20Kit: A Web 2.0 technology evaluation kit

2008-08-26 Thread Craig L Russell
This is a proposal to incubate http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Web20KitProposal We're looking for a couple more mentors. Web20Kit Abstract Web20Kit is a web 2.0 toolkit to help developers evaluate the suitability, functionality and performance of various web technologies by implementing a

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote on accepting Etch into the Incubator. +1 (non-binding) /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [

Re: Add voting guide to incubator docs?

2008-08-26 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Martijn, On Aug 24, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: There is always a lot of confusion on whose votes are binding in our podlings. The PPMC guide has a small, easy to overlook sentence which states the obviously not so obvious: "And note that binding votes are those cast by Incubat

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 for incubation. Craig On Aug 25, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be in the vote thread. Here is the text of the proposal: == Abstract == Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent framework for b

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 (binding) On Aug 25, 2008, at 10:22 AM, James Dixson wrote: Please vote on accepting Etch into the Incubator. The Etch proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal -- James - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 - robert On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be > in the vote thread. > Here is the text of the proposal: > > == Abstract == > > Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independ

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Roland Weber
+1 (binding) cheers, Roland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Poloka

2008-08-26 Thread Roland Weber
Hello Serge, thanks for the detailed reply. We have started a discussion with Davanum Shrinivas from the Apache WS community. [...] I have posted the proposal in the Savan list as well. Good. If discussion there moves forward, you could occasionally send a summary here for those that don't f

RE: [PROPOSAL] Poloka

2008-08-26 Thread Mankovskii, Serge
Hello Roland Thank you for the comments! It is encouraging to see that somebody undertook an effort of reading the proposal so carefuly and giving so many good comments! We have started a discussion with Davanum Shrinivas from the Apache WS community. We asked Davanum to Champion the project with

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be > in the vote thread. > Here is the text of the proposal: > > == Abstract == > > Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent > fram

Re: [VOTE] accept Etch into the Incubator

2008-08-26 Thread Niclas Hedhman
+1 (binding) Cheers Niclas On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be > in the vote thread. > Here is the text of the proposal: > > == Abstract == > > Etch is a cross-platform, language- and tra

Re: IP Clearance form re INCUBATOR-77

2008-08-26 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 8/25/08, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to resolve INCUBATOR-77 and I feel stuck on the wording in > the clearance template: > "Check and make sure that for all items included with the >distribution that is not under the Apache license, > we have >