Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

Is there a potential trademark issue with Google? I worry about the similarity in name to Picasa, especially given they both are web-based photo galleries. Apologies if this has already been discussed. WILL On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > >

RE: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

+1 --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

+1 Martijn (who points at jalbum.net as a photo gallery generating Java product, though partly LGPL, partly closed source) On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > please vote on accepting project PicaGalley > (originally proposed under the name of Ca

Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

Sounds interesting. +1 On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 20:02 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi all, > > please vote on accepting project PicaGalley > (originally proposed under the name of Caitrin) > for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor. > > This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT, >

Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

+1 (non-binding), and I second all that was said by Roland. On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 of course > > When this came in as Caitrin, it was a proposal > for a codebase with no community. Since then, it > has changed into a little community without a

Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

+1 of course When this came in as Caitrin, it was a proposal for a codebase with no community. Since then, it has changed into a little community without a specific codebase, but several codebases to draw from or use as a starting base. I find this a much more convincing proposition. Convincing e

Audit Report: 2008-07-26 -> 2008-08-02

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Audit Report: 2008-07-26 -> 2008-08-02 == * 10 files were added * 0 files were modified * 0 files were deleted Added - - In /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.94: * apache-sanselan-incubating-0

[VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

Hi all, please vote on accepting project PicaGalley (originally proposed under the name of Caitrin) for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor. This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT, unless major discussions ensue. Votes of IPMC members are binding, a minimum of three +1 is re

Re: [VOTE][POLICY] fix table of contents

Noel J. Bergman wrote: I don't believe that this requires a vote, and can be addressed by lazy consensus. I thought about that myself. But given the choice between starting a discussion about whether a vote is required, or turning this into a simple testcase for me calling votes in the Incubat

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-80) ToC of the policy is inconsistent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Roland Weber closed INCUBATOR-80. - Resolution: Fixed The vote has passed and I committed the patch. I couldn't update the site th

[VOTE][RESULT][POLICY] fix table of contents

This vote passes with eight +1, all of them binding, and no other votes cast. I'll apply the patch. +1: Niclas Hedhman Davanum Srinivas Ant Elder Martijn Dashorst Roland Weber Robert Burrell Donkin Craig L. Russell Noel J. Bergman cheers, Roland Roland Weber wrote: As explained in INCUBATO

Re: SVN move

Hi Craig, You have lost me here. Are you saying that the supposed license contradicts the patent grants in the Apache license, which are explicitly mentioned by the required notices? Has this ever happened, or are we in hypothetical-land? Alan asked a what-if question, so we are safely with