Yes that was the paragraph I was referring to.
Paul
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:29 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Are you referring to the "SOAP/Web Services offer an interesting comparison
> ..." paragraph?
>
> If so, then I agree it is probably redundant to the Etch ration
Craig L Russell wrote:
It takes at least a week for an incubating release to get out because in
addition to getting everything right the first time, you need a 3 day
vote in the project and a 3 day vote in the incubator.
Bullshit
It takes 3 days. You need 3 binding PMC votes from the Incub
Paul,
Are you referring to the "SOAP/Web Services offer an interesting comparison
..." paragraph?
If so, then I agree it is probably redundant to the Etch rationale and I can
remove it.
--
james
On 8/1/08 12:34 PM, "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James
>
> I know its popular to
we might have overdone the committer list here a bit so nobody who made
a significant contribution felt left out. :-)
(in addition to what james dixson has reported about himself) for the
last two months, the main contributors to the compiler and the java and
csharp bindings (the core) have be
James Dixson wrote:
This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
+1 for incubation.
I will gladly be a mentor.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James
I know its popular to bash SOAP at this point, but there are simple
factual inaccuracies in your "why not SOAP" section. Rather than argue
about the details I'd like to point out that this section is
redundant. Do you really feel you need this in there? If you do I'll
start listing your inac
Well, personally I have been heavily involved in or have written outright
the build system, compiler interface, and ant plug-in. I am currently
working on a maven mojo and as well as a python binding that has full parity
with the Java and C# bindings. I am a Manager at Cisco, but I am Developer
wit
thrift had a number of issues as we considered it more than a year ago. we
thought, well, we could fix these issues, but as they'd require interface
changes then we'd be breaking someone else's code and the fixes would be
substantial and then we'd have to negotiate each and every one of them, b
Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:10, James Dixson wrote:
I am a bit confused though about the "too good" concern, I do not think I
understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
I think it was Stefano Mazzocchi who said about community building, that the
o
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 14 people from one organisation on the initial committer list looks to
> me like a daunting incubation.
Indeed. Which of those people will actually be working on Etch going forward?
A quick perusal shows a Manager and a Direct
The watercooler problem is real, but addressable. We accept that in order
for a community around Etch to grow, communication has to be open. Much of
our communication and discussion about Etch has been mediated over email as
our intramural community is geographically distributed. It is not a stretc
Ah. Well, then I do not think there is anything to worry about as far as
Etch is concerned. There are many, many potential growth points for the
project. A simple example, Etch supports Java and C# language bindings today
with a binary-transport. One of the committers, Seth Call, is working on a
J
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
James, could you perhaps describe how this differs from Thrift?
-Yonik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:10, James Dixson wrote:
> I am a bit confused though about the "too good" concern, I do not think I
> understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
I think it was Stefano Mazzocchi who said about community building, that the
only "Bad Code + Great Vision" will succeed
Niclas, thanks for the support it is much appreciated. I will put you down
as as 'willing' on Mentor and Champion.
I understand the "at office" concern, it is a mode of operation and we (the
committers) all understand the importance of public communication and
consensus.
I am a bit confused thoug
14 people from one organisation on the initial committer list looks to
me like a daunting incubation. To get some level of independence from
Cisco, that will mean recruiting at least 14 new committers. That is a
major task.
I see Shindig having the same issue - it is moving fast, and developing
w
You adressed the two concerns that I have, too, thanks.
- The name. "Debian Etch" is a deeply engrained meme with the "Etch"
short cut.
- Office disussions. Projects where a large number of committers are
from the same organization and that also have this company being
invested in the project mig
17 matches
Mail list logo
