It's worth noting that in the dev vote:
+1
Carsten Ziegeler
Charles Matthew Chen
Craig L Russell
Jeremias Maerki
Jukka Zitting
Carsten, Craig, Jeremias, and Jukka all cast binding votes.
This vote will conclude 72 hours after it was called.
Craig
On Jul 26, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Charles Matthew
[craig] I think I got the attribution correct in this. Please correct
if I got it wrong.
On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
[bill]The act of a tag-tar-vote-release at the ASF is an act of
the foundation
(as long as the RM/PMC follows the whole process) so it is a
shield, of
Ask Cayenne who worked that way for a long time.
Ciao
Henning
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 11:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
> > old project site, to minimize disruption for
Apache Sanselan is a pure-Java image library which supports reading
and writing image data and metadata from a variety of file formats.
The first proposed incubator release is now ready.
The proposed release can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.94/
Th
Hi Alan,
see my 0.02€ below...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussi
On Jul 26, 2008, at 2:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you provide one example? Just curious
While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
old project site, to minimize disruption fo
Am I missing some context here? Why does adding a project
to the status files require new (and unrelated) files to
be added?
sitemap.xml is in directory site-author, yet has a
"DO NOT EDIT - THIS IS GENERATED" disclaimer.
The PDF seems to be ancient history, Geronimo is a TLP.
cheers,
Roland
On Jul 26, 2008, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Follow-on releases c
Yes. Most, if not all, all of ASF project's subversion repository
works this way. It seems bizarre to me as an ASF member.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 26, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Really?
So if I make a commit for my project, and that is revision N, then if
someone immediately mak
Really?
So if I make a commit for my project, and that is revision N, then if
someone immediately makes a commit for a totally different project, that
would be N+1?
I thought only the Incubator worked like that. Seems really bizzare to me
as an ASF newbie
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:12 PM, N
> when [graduating] to a TLP, were you able to retain
> the history while working in the Incubator when you
> moved to an SVN repo of your own?
You don't move to an SVN repo of your own. You stay in the main ASF
repository, along with all other ASF projects and other public content.
---
This brings up a follow-up question - when Wicket graduated to a TLP, were
you able to retain the history while working in the Incubator when you moved
to an SVN repo of your own?
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Marti
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Can you provide one example? Just curious
> >
> > While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
> > old
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> it really is a problem IMO when incoming *open source*
> projects have to ditch their collected history. If we
> care about code provenance, having the full history
> available is best.
I concur, although I'm not sure that everyone does.
--- Noel
-
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
> old project site, to minimize disruption for their existing users
> while they were repackaging and cleaning up for an ASF release.
If I recall correctly, the first project that had to address this
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can you provide one example? Just curious
>
> While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
> old project site, to minimize disruption for their existing users
> while they were repackagin
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
17 matches
Mail list logo
