Noel,
We plan to prepare a preliminary proposal that should address many of these
questions (technical state, membership, interfaces with other technologies,
etc). I'll send it to the mailing list for discussion as soon as possible.. I
can tell you that the current version of the framework meet
Hi Eelco,
The project site contains mainly technical/download information. We haven't
been using it for anything else (mailing list, forums, etc). We believe the
Apache incubator would be a better venue for building community. Everyone
interested in contributing is welcome. On the other hand th
+1
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
--
David Sheppard wrote:
> Our project (Jt Pattern Oriented Framework [http://jt.dev.java.net/]) is
> interested in joining the ASF incubator.
> After getting familiar with the incubator policies and procedures, we are
> looking for people interested in becoming a champion or a mentor. We hope
> to
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running mvn:site on the source distro, but it failed
generating the javadocs because the uimaj-as pom.xml specifies
1.4 for the javadoc plugin and there are JDK 1.5+
features used. When I changed that to "1.5" the javadocs generation
then failed throwing a MissingRe
The results of this vote are:
+1's from Ken Coar, ant elder, Niall Pemberton, and Jim Jagielski
No other votes were received.
The vote passes. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to review and
vote on this release :-)
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Please review and v
+1
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running mvn:site on the source distro, but it failed
generating the javadocs because the uimaj-as pom.xml specifies
1.4 for the javadoc plugin and there are JDK 1.5+
features used. When I changed that to "1.5" the javadocs generatio
Hi Ed,
Judging from http://jt.dev.java.net/, there is one active person on
the project, and now discussion or other signs of community
whatshowever. Wouldn't it be a good idea to start building up a
community on that site first?
Regards,
Eelco
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:19 PM, David S <[EMAIL P
a cursory assessment...
License currently is LGPL.
CVS history goes back to August 2006.
All commits by "wwwfswcom".
Not a single message on the dev list.
Not a single posting in the forum.
Looks like a case of open source, closed development.
On the plus side, changing the license shouldn't be
