On 9-Jul-08, at 4:42 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
However, the Maven repository situation has little to do with the
need for
an Incubator.
Obviously you choose to pick out everying Ron's w
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fwiw. My objection(s) had nothing to do with security.
I was just responding to comments by Noel and Paul. Sorry for the tangent.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Jukka,
fwiw. My objection(s) had nothing to do with security.
thanks,
dims
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> [...] Until the Maven PMC stops abrog
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> [...] Until the Maven PMC stops abrogating its responsibility and addresses
>> the issues, there does not appear to be anything that we can do about
>> Maven's flaws short of banning use of the p
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, the Maven repository situation has little to do with the need for
an Incubator.
Obviously you choose to pick out everying Ron's writing about the
flaws in Maven / the Maven repository wh
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't it just a IP Clearance SVN now once people have their way with
> no distinction at all between incubator and non-incubator code?
>
> What incentives are there left to graduate? How come a little bit of
> pain that
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:21:24PM +, Santiago Gala wrote:
>> spidermonkey is the only component that has a more restrictive license, and
>> the third party licensing policy document lists MPL in the B category. So I
>> th
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the Maven repository situation has little to do with the need for
> an Incubator.
Obviously you choose to pick out everying Ron's writing about the
flaws in Maven / the Maven repository while at the same time ca
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:21:24PM +, Santiago Gala wrote:
> spidermonkey is the only component that has a more restrictive license, and
> the third party licensing policy document lists MPL in the B category. So I
> think we can choose MPL and distribute it in binary form, etc.
My understandi
Craig wrote:
> So as long as your installer makes it clear to the user that the
> external bits are not Apache-licensed, I read the policy as allowing
> the CouchDb installer to fetch and install them and thereby
> make them available to the CouchDb user.
Thanks for the pointer .
This makes s
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
There is no reason for a separate repository. [A separate repo] does not
help protect "users" from incubator code, since users don't set the Maven
configs that define which repos to use and which modules are dependencies.
At best, what it does is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Happy to confirm it was indeed a rant :) Just wanted folks to see all points of
view before they cast their vote.
Especially to at least understand why a particular "feature" was in place and
think thru the pros and cons.
thanks,
dims
William A. R
Angela Cymbalak wrote:
I think that I am in a unique position to comment on this question. I
am sure there are a lot of legal things and the Maven repository that
can be pointed to as reasons why not to have an Incubator but I have
been very pleased with the fact that Apache *does* have the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
There is no reason for a separate repository. [A separate repo] does not
help protect "users" from incubator code, since users don't set the Maven
configs that define which repos to use and which modules are dependencies.
At best, what it does is
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mié, 09-07-2008 a las 12:41 -0400, James Carman escribió:
>> Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
>> the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
>> dependencies? Will cou
I think that I am in a unique position to comment on this
question. I am sure there are a lot of legal things and the Maven
repository that can be pointed to as reasons why not to have an
Incubator but I have been very pleased with the fact that Apache
*does* have the Incubator. It has been i
Luciano,
I think that this may be a workable idea. Without a doubt, we will
need the image manipulation abilities of Sanselan and I have no
problem helping on that project as well. I'll take a look at the Web
page for the project. I'd like to get the proposal for the gallery
finished soon.
El mié, 09-07-2008 a las 12:41 -0400, James Carman escribió:
> Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
> the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
> dependencies? Will couchdb run at all without them?
The way I see it Erlang can be considered a "pl
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:41 AM, James Carman wrote:
Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
the apache license part out the window?
No, Apache distributions contain Apache-licensed code and Apache-
compatible-licensed code.
Many Apache projects have dependencies
Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
dependencies? Will couchdb run at all without them?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Philip
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> There is no reason for a separate repository. [A separate repo] does not
> help protect "users" from incubator code, since users don't set the Maven
> configs that define which repos to use and which modules are dependencies.
> At best, what it does is add an irrelevant
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Howdy:
I am working on couchdb installers that I would like to contribute
back to
the project:
A fully functional CouchDb install has a few external dependencies
such as:
- ICU (ICU License a BSD/MIT style license)
- Mozilla SpiderMon
Howdy:
I am working on couchdb installers that I would like to contribute back to
the project:
A fully functional CouchDb install has a few external dependencies such as:
- ICU (ICU License a BSD/MIT style license)
- Mozilla SpiderMonkey (MPL, GPL or LGPL)
- Erlang (ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE)
- Opens
23 matches
Mail list logo
