Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project

2008-06-06 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Day after day, acres of pixels are needlessly harvested because of the shear hubris in the decision to name this list "general" and not "gen".Our planet's oceans just cannot support this unbridled consumption. Plus there's of all the megawatts expended just to even render that extra "e

Re: about CCLA.

2008-06-06 Thread Carl Trieloff
Edward J. Yoon wrote: Hello, I have some question about CCLA. Should we have a CCLA even if it is an individual work? and, In the similar context, how does that apply to an individual working for government agency? Thanks. If you are not independent -- i.e. work for a company then you sho

RE: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes to ratify PPMC committers

2008-06-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Henri Yandell wrote: >>> I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship >>> modeling the board whenever possible. >> Keeping in mind that the PPMC has no actual standing, so the vote still >> requires the standard 3 +1 and

Re: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes to ratify PPMC committers

2008-06-06 Thread Craig L Russell
On Jun 6, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Friday 06 June 2008 09:26, Craig L Russell wrote: Just so I'm clear on the proposal, if the PPMC votes in private, and no Mentors or PMC members vote, the vote passes with 15 non-binding +1 votes, and no binding votes, then lazy consensus