Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The time people have to spend chasing bugs because someone doesn't
have the right version on the classpath (or possibly multiple versions
without knowing it) can be better spent on solving actual bugs,
writing documentation or implementing new features.
Or by reviewing o
I'm sorry - I had mixed up Noel's comments with Sam (which is not an easy
thing to do once you know them both ;-)
Please don't worry about plugging legal into the loop until you are done.
Then just send a notice to legal-discuss@ with a link to the page. It's
really that simple, they trust "us"
On 4/17/08, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, to sum it up, we must align our donation to open source with current
> oracle
> deliverable dates and branches to ensure existing products and
> customers are not affected.
>
> We don't want a "through it over the wall" donation.
On 4/23/08, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Among the UIMA committers, I'm the main proponent of the "no version
> numbers in jar names". Jar file names that change in each version
> have always driven me crazy because they force users to update their
> classpaths when they upgrade the
I had a catastrophic failure of my mail server yesterday (the / partition
failed to the point where fsck could not recover). Just catching up, using a
backup server, and had to go to the archives to find the traffic:
Robert wrote:
> If the IP template should be RTC then it should be moved into
It seems that our mentors are very busy with other stuff, can please someone
else look at this
release and approve it?
Thanks in advance!
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
> The Apache UIMA project ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to
> publish the
> first UIMA Sandbox annotator rel
