On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROTFLMHO.. So tell us how you really feel Roy. :) For what it's worth, I
> agree with you, especially for projects entering incubator.
submit a patch ;-)
- robert
--
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
> that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
> decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making.
> The required IP clearan
ROTFLMHO.. So tell us how you really feel Roy. :) For what it's
worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering incubator.
Scott
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making.
The required IP clearance questions should be:
Date:
Identify the Contribution:
Identify the Contri
Hello Incubator PMC -
Thank you for your reviews of this; please do not confuse this with
another release vote just posted for the UIMA Add-on package, which is
another piece of the project, moving forward under a separate packaging
and vote.
For this vote, so far we have 1 +1 vote (only).
