Re: CXF has graduated!

2008-04-16 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thought the [EMAIL PROTECTED] audience might like to see this > > -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: CXF has graduated! > Date: Wednesday 16 April 2008 > From: Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Fwd: CXF has graduated!

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
Thought the [EMAIL PROTECTED] audience might like to see this -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: CXF has graduated! Date: Wednesday 16 April 2008 From: Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am happy and proud to announce that at this month's board meeting

Re: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2008-04-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 16, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: There needs to be a balance. And I am satisfied that the Incubator PMC has been taking the right line on the issue so far, subjective as the line may be. FWIW, I also agree. And as a mentor, I think it results in a better podling/PPMC

Re: Requesting proper karma for Tuscany Committers to access repo/private/committers

2008-04-16 Thread Luciano Resende
Thanks Santiago. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 16:24 -0700, Luciano Resende escribió: > > > Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating

2008-04-16 Thread Michael Baessler
Is there anything else needed from the UIMA team to get this release approved? -- Michael Michael Baessler wrote: > That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting > the build - sorry for > that. > > I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced t

RE: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2008-04-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> 1. the incubator should be concerned about the composition of the >>> proposed PMC. > Only that the community will be welcoming to newcomers and not treat the > ASF community-project as the "company's private project" Those are prima

Re: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2008-04-16 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > > > IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading > > > the word diversity was also probably a mistake. maybe we need to focu

Re: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2008-04-16 Thread ant elder
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That would make the PPMC be about 50% IBM day job and 50% (non IBMers > or > > IBM non-day jobers). Can we take it to a private

Re: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2008-04-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading the word diversity was also probably a mistake. maybe we need to focus on narrower concepts with alternative names. 1. the incubator should be concerned about the comp

Re: Requesting proper karma for Tuscany Committers to access repo/private/committers

2008-04-16 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 16:24 -0700, Luciano Resende escribió: > > Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some > > Tuscany committers that does not have access to > > repo/private/committers. Fro