The Apache Abdera community is pleased to announce the 0.4.0-incubating
release.
You can download binary and source distributions from:
http://incubator.apache.org/abdera
Introduction
The goal of the Apache Abdera project is to build a
functionally-complete, high-performance imp
I'd like to take this opportunity to share information about how
Apache Tuscany project has positively moved forward to build a larger
community that is more integrated within the Apache ecosystem. I
would make the following bullets so they stand out
- We have welcomed 3 new committers, and have
sebb wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>> On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> > Indeed, but see also:
> >>
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
> >>
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Actually, there is a "reverse" issue It also makes it quite
difficult for people to help with UIMA if they are also contributors to
other projects that DO use the normal svn settings, Eclipse or not.
For example, lets pretend for a moment that I'm a Windows user that
sebb wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
Indeed, but see also:
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of
Common
Actually, there is a "reverse" issue It also makes it quite
difficult for people to help with UIMA if they are also contributors to
other projects that DO use the normal svn settings, Eclipse or not.
For example, lets pretend for a moment that I'm a Windows user that uses
eclipse and
sebb wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
True. We try to avoid that ;-). Although most of us work on windows,
we use unix style eol chars for all source code.
That probably annoys the Mac Users...
We have Mac users (and developers), and they haven't
compl
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Indeed, but see also:
> > > >
> > > >
> http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
> > > >
> > > > These conventions are generally used
On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:47 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/
impl/model/SDO.mdl
==C:/Tuscany
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > The SVN tag
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
Indeed, but see also:
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of
Commons.
Yes, and they don't work for us, as I pointed out earlier.
There ar
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > sebb wrote:
> >
On 4/9/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Should have voted myself, so +1.
>
> Anyone else able to review and vote on this?
No blockers, +1 from me.
Matthieu
...ant
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the 1.1 rele
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> > Indeed, but see also:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
> >
> > These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of
> > Commons.
>
> Yes, and they don't work for us, as I pointed out earlier.
>
> Th
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> >> For the java code we could set it to native. We just never
> >> felt the need. Since we need to be careful with our test
> >> files, we don't follow the automatic eol-style client
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > Problem building uimaj:
> >
> > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
Unfortuna
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
For the java code we could set it to native. We just never
felt the need. Since we need to be careful with our test
files, we don't follow the automatic eol-style client setup
as recommended. AFAIK, all UIMA developers use Eclipse
sebb wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The SVN tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file
uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh
in
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/SVNf
sebb wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission
>> to publish a new bug fix
>> >> release of Apache UIMA version
On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sebb wrote:
> > > > Problem building uimaj:
> > > >
> > > > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> >
> > Unf
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > Problem building uimaj:
> > >
> > > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > >
>
> Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> For the java code we could set it to native. We just never
> felt the need. Since we need to be careful with our test
> files, we don't follow the automatic eol-style client setup
> as recommended. AFAIK, all UIMA developers use Eclipse
> for their d
On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to
> publish a new bug fix
> >> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > The SVN tag
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
> >
> > has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file
> >
> > uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh
> > in
> > http://peop
sebb wrote:
> On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to
>> publish a new bug fix
>> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of
>> for release version 2.2.1
>> that was pub
That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting
the build - sorry for
that.
I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced the files for
the maven repository.
Now all seems to be correct!
-- Michael
Kevan Miller wrote:
> Sources jars (e.g.
> http:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:35 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
> > > (search for "Apache Tuscany
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
>
>
>
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
>
>
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-i
29 matches
Mail list logo
