Notice added. Do you see anything else?
- James
sebb wrote:
[snip]
> Also, SVN includes the file
>
dependencies/i18n/src/main/java/org/apache/abdera/i18n/text/data/CompositionExclusions.txt
> which is not AL licensed; IMO it should be attributed in the NOTICE file.
>
I've just removed t
Hi Robert,
I just went through this exercise with another project, and I now
believe best practice is to import the files with the original
copyright notices intact and then as part of the evolution of the
project, modify the files to the new Apache headers, moving the
copyright notices t
On 01/04/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> sebb wrote:
> > The following do not seem to be test files, nor are they trivially short.
> > So they should have AL headers please:
> >
> > core/src/main/resources/abdera.properties.example
> > dependencies/deps.properties
> >
>
sebb wrote:
The following do not seem to be test files, nor are they trivially short.
So they should have AL headers please:
core/src/main/resources/abdera.properties.example
dependencies/deps.properties
Done
The top level NOTICE file should not have the 4 line == header.
Removed
Also
The following do not seem to be test files, nor are they trivially short.
So they should have AL headers please:
core/src/main/resources/abdera.properties.example
dependencies/deps.properties
The top level NOTICE file should not have the 4 line == header.
Also, SVN includes the file
dependencies/
I've added license headers to the build scripts and to the localization
file and log4j.properties file. The rest I intend to leave as is. Is
that sufficient? If so, we'll roll a new build.
- James
sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the FAQ I see this: "A
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably.
> Though if the AL header affects the parsing, then there may well be a
> problem with the parsing...
Please. Are you actually suggesting that it's a good idea to make all
of our test cases demonstrably different fro
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd probably error on the side of caution here, and add license
> headers in all files, unless it breakes something. Most if not all
> projects does add the license headers in maven pom files, property
> files, etc. I'
OK, thanks. Will do. I guess I need Incubator Karma according to the
IP Grant page, since I am the Lucene chair.
-Grant
On Mar 31, 2008, at 5:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on
http://
Dear Bertrand, Thanks for your help.
> IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case),
> that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community
> elsewhere before entering incubation.
That seems like a fair bet. I'll rev up the community of the hama and
recrui
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed.
> Someone please reply to me
Yes, at least one mentor, and ideally up to three, are needed for a
project to enter incubation.
IMHO, if no one is interested in mento
Dear Grant, Thanks for your +1.
I feel with you about your mention of the "lack of interest from
Hadoop", but I think that shouldn't be a problem; we can communicate
with hadoop people in real time if we need.
BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed.
Someone please reply to me.
Thanks.
On F
12 matches
Mail list logo
